Not Sportsmen at all? Hmm.. I've got deer within 500 yards of my Lazy-Boy on any given day. I'm good enough to put a bullet in them from there too! I don't even need a 36" barrel and mechanical rest. Think of all the time and money I could save. I wouldn't have to get up at O'dark:30, shower with scent free soap, put on Camo, spray scent eliminator on my clothes and boots, trudge through woods full of them dang crunchy leaves, and
actually spend a day in the deers' home trying to play hide and seek! All I really need to do to be a TRUE SPORTSMAN is to put the TV remote down for 5 seconds, lean out the window from my Lazy-Boy and squeeze off a shot at that trophy buck. Now I can brag about the size of that 10 point rack to my buddies because I am a great HUNTER and TRUE SPORTSMAN! I sure showed my huntin prowess with that rifle shot!
Now previously, Chisolm asked where do you draw the line, 200, 300, 400 yards? Well, that's a dang good question! Only each one of us can answer that individually from one moment to the next. I can make a 500 yard shot comfortably with a 7 pound hunting rifle if I have a solid rest, low wind, animal is not moving at all and I'm not shivering my cajones off. But take away any of those comforts and my range decreases greatly. So can you average pie plate groups at 1000 yards and do it for accuracy to a bullseye every day? How do you know the animal won't take a step as you pull the trigger? When shooting 1000 yard deer, do you have all the comforts afforded the firing line where you get those pie plate groups? I don't think you could call it 1000 yard hunting. Deer target shooting maybe? Can't you just draw a deer outline on paper? Does your "hunting" bullet even perform as it should at its 1000 yard velocity? Do you need to bet against wounding the deer for some reason? Is that an easy bet for you to wager?
I've read plenty of other posts where the members of this forum wax poetic about the great difficulty in shooting at 1000 yards. (reading wind, vertical stringing, cold barrel, ambient temperature, elevation etc) So which is it? An extremely difficult proposition where small changes can greatly affect your accuracy? or an easily controllable situation where the differences between a good shot and bad shot are easily within say, the "kill zone" at any given time?
The way I was taught, hunting is a PRIVILEDGE not a right. That priviledge is afforded us mostly by non-hunters who any year now could vote to REMOVE that priviledge from our comfortable lives. I for one am in an every day battle with liberals that I know and am forced to deal with, who do not really understand hunting. Many of them do not understand why I feel the need to hunt. I try to explain to them that my hunting party stresses ethics. I try to explain that it really isn't like you see on TV where there seems to be a trophy animal standing broadside over every ridgeline. On TV where they seem to just take an easy rifle shot and then commence to celebrating their victory. I try to explain that we NEVER fire on an animal unless we are sure its a one shot kill. That we pass up seemingly easy shots because there was some doubt. I explain that it is not about the "kill", it is really about the many many hours spent learning about our environment on a level that the average hiker never sees.
So next time you decide to speak to people in public about hunting, remember the people listening to the conversation may be the votes that decide whether you are ALLOWED to continue to do it. If your method of hunting doesn't sound good amongst your gun shooting peers, how's it going to sound to some neutral person who may be "on the fence" about shooting sports and hunting? Hopefully this concern is as important to you as it is to me. God Bless.