V
vmaster59
Guest
This was a few days ago at one of the ranches.
Thanks Clint.
Thanks Clint.
L
Locoweed
Guest
Up in Alaska they call it "Termination Dust."
V
vmaster59
Guest
LOL.
Clint
Clint
John Kielly
Shari's fan club
Here in always-sunny Queensland we call it a myth!
S
ShadowChaser
Guest
Millions of dead white albino mosquitoes...
V
vinny
Guest
Silly boys, why it's GLOBAL WARMING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Just ask Al Gore, oh, wait a minute I forgot, he's not taking any questions.
G
Gundog 64
Guest
Looks like a plane from Columbia was flying over and had to dump its cargo.
John
John
B
Big Al
Guest
After three days of the white sh_t falling from the sky here in Alaska, I think it pictures of Al Gore with clear evidence of global warming.
"Alaskans for Global Warming"
"Alaskans for Global Warming"
Bill Wynne
Active member
Now that is the scenic part of West Texas. Look at those oil wells busy at work. Drill Baby Drill!
That snow just makes a nice touch.
Concho Bill
That snow just makes a nice touch.
Concho Bill
A
abintx
Guest
I agree!!! In yesteryear, you wouldn't have been able to see any of the brush or chaparral.
G
Gerry
Guest
Whay is this white stuff?
Here in Central New York we call it''
WHITE SH-T
Wait till you have to shovel it 3 times a day''''
Here in Central New York we call it''
WHITE SH-T
Wait till you have to shovel it 3 times a day''''
Bill Wynne
Active member
Out here in Texas we enjoy snow when it is put down on the land.
We figure "what the Lord puts down, he will take away".
It works for us every time.
Concho Bill
V
vinny
Guest
Thats because it doesn't last much pass noon I bet.
L
Louis Boyd
Guest
Maybe he's not taking questions but he's taking all the tax money he can thanks to our elected idiots in Congress.
O
Old Gunner
Guest
The whie fluffy stuff is ashes from the burning forests caused by Global Warming, the chill you feel is terror at the thought of all the blazing Polar Bears trying desperately to find a patch of ice to roll around on to put out the fire.
I remember when the hysterics first got into full swing, everywhere you looked there'd be psuedo-scientific articles with images of molten lead rivers on Venus and claims that CO2 build up would reach a tipping point where Earth would be transformed into a hellish planet like Venus.
I can also remember when Acid rain first became a cause celebre', with articles describing people getting caught in the rain and the flesh being dissolved as they ran for shelter.
Then the New Ice Age of the seventies. When can we expect the scientific community to thank US Industry for its timely countermeasure of pumping CO2 into the air to counteract the Ice Age that would have otherwise destroyed civilization by 1990?
Since I do a little stargazing I had already known of the increased albedo of solar system objects due to increased solar activity since the 60's, so it stood to reason that a planet whose surface is heated by sunlight would grow slightly warmer when that sunlight increased. Took a lot of jiggery pokery for them to try to explain that away.
Then they had to totally ignore all historical evidence of the Medieval warming Period, without which the Norse could never have established new world colonies or their tenuous foothold on Iceland, which was much more hospitable in those days.
If the facts don't fit the theory they simply ignore or suppress the facts. No attempt at debate, if anyone asks a question they hem and haw for a moment then point a finger and screech like Pod People chanting "Stooge of the Oil company", while muttering "capitalist running dog" under their breath no doubt.
I'm in high style tonight, just got through reading the gloating comments of atheists and other anti-christians proclaiming that a single Jewish first century shroud with a common weave was absolute proof that the Shroud of Turin was a fake so Christ must not have existed. That level of blind faith in a rag certainly matches any they attribute to Catholics who believe in the Shroud.
If my comments here step over the line please edit and delete them, my intention is not to promote religion but rather to blow off some steam at psuedo-science and the disturbing arrogance of semi educated worshippers of false logic that fills the net these days. Theres not a first year philosophy major alive today that doesn't believe they can prove a negative by appealing to ignorance or substitution of correlation for causation.
End of rant.
I remember when the hysterics first got into full swing, everywhere you looked there'd be psuedo-scientific articles with images of molten lead rivers on Venus and claims that CO2 build up would reach a tipping point where Earth would be transformed into a hellish planet like Venus.
I can also remember when Acid rain first became a cause celebre', with articles describing people getting caught in the rain and the flesh being dissolved as they ran for shelter.
Then the New Ice Age of the seventies. When can we expect the scientific community to thank US Industry for its timely countermeasure of pumping CO2 into the air to counteract the Ice Age that would have otherwise destroyed civilization by 1990?
Since I do a little stargazing I had already known of the increased albedo of solar system objects due to increased solar activity since the 60's, so it stood to reason that a planet whose surface is heated by sunlight would grow slightly warmer when that sunlight increased. Took a lot of jiggery pokery for them to try to explain that away.
Then they had to totally ignore all historical evidence of the Medieval warming Period, without which the Norse could never have established new world colonies or their tenuous foothold on Iceland, which was much more hospitable in those days.
If the facts don't fit the theory they simply ignore or suppress the facts. No attempt at debate, if anyone asks a question they hem and haw for a moment then point a finger and screech like Pod People chanting "Stooge of the Oil company", while muttering "capitalist running dog" under their breath no doubt.
I'm in high style tonight, just got through reading the gloating comments of atheists and other anti-christians proclaiming that a single Jewish first century shroud with a common weave was absolute proof that the Shroud of Turin was a fake so Christ must not have existed. That level of blind faith in a rag certainly matches any they attribute to Catholics who believe in the Shroud.
If my comments here step over the line please edit and delete them, my intention is not to promote religion but rather to blow off some steam at psuedo-science and the disturbing arrogance of semi educated worshippers of false logic that fills the net these days. Theres not a first year philosophy major alive today that doesn't believe they can prove a negative by appealing to ignorance or substitution of correlation for causation.
End of rant.