4
4Mesh
Guest
After giving that post some thought, sorry benenglish, but, I ain't buy'n it. Sounds more like something I'd expect in a sermon. The more people I think about, whom I've met in my lifetime, who were either there or in Europe, going back through the many conversations I've had, I just can't remember one of them every saying, "awww shucks, those Japs or Jerries fought valiantly and you just can't hate em for that. Gee, they're just nice folk like anybody else, they just were told to go kill millions of folks so they did. All those folks who are dead? Ahhh, it's just war, no hard feelings! Let's go help em out now... ".Interesting. I used to have a father, too, and he spent WWII in the occupied Philippines, having to evac before MacArthur started to make good on his promise to return. He saw and participated in bad, bad things and was forever scarred, physically and emotionally, by that war. You have to know that a six foot tall man who comes out of the jungle weighing just a tick over 100 pounds has been through hell.
Yet, for all the savagery he had witnessed, he had a completely different view of the Japanese. In his view, they fought with everything they had while they were at war, just as good soldiers should. Then, when the Emperor told them to lay down arms, they did. There was no post-surrender spite directed towards the occupying forces. He spent a great deal of time stationed in Tokyo and considered that the many Japanese he dealt with displayed an honorable deference to their conquerors. He likened their behavior to the best sort of southern U.S. good manners.
They were defeated. They knew it. And they acted like it. He respected them for that and was highly intolerant of his many peers who held a grudge. (Though, to be fair, he was willing to admit that if he had been Chinese or if he had been captured, he would probably be unable to be so generous in his outlook.)
It's interesting to me how history, both in textbooks and in the family, echoes down through the years. Clearly, different men take different views of wars past, both then and now.
And just to offer something on-topic - I'm finding that the Japan disaster coverage on BoingBoing.net is exemplary. They link out to lots of good sources. Here's a particularly good section on finding responsible, accurate coverage of the nuclear plant problems (as opposed to the dubiously accurate, typically ax-grinding crap that usually passes for news in the mainstream media): http://www.boingboing.net/2011/03/14/japanese-nuclear-pla.html#comments
Huh? You serious?
My Brother-in-laws father, (late father as of last winter) was Either 101st or 82nd Airbourne, Normandy to Berlin. I can't recall which, but, there is a sign hanging in Williamsport with his photo on it, followed by one of my father. They were pretty good friends. Never in all my day did I remember either one ever mention even one person they had known who shared this forgive-and-forget attitude. Fact is, I'd bet a person would have been scared to admit such an attitude during that period of time. Which is why above I say, I'm not buy'n it.
I've been a WWII buff since I was in grade school. Hate to say it but that's been a while. I've met a remarkable number of WW2 vets. Can't say I ever even heard of any with that attitude. Most of em would have gladly gone back in a B52 any day.
As an aside...
Our office guy at work who went to Haiti was part of a church group who knew of the corruption in all this "Aid", so, they decided they'd just circumvent all that donation crap and do some good on their own. They got the church (rather big church) to get a fund and buy a container load of building materials and they were gonna go down and help rebuild an orphanage down there. Many of em went down, when they got there, 'Hey! There's our container! Let's get started!' Opened it up, and there was nothing in it.
Muchos Gracias!
You can't beat these people...
And that's a true story... Sadly
Last edited by a moderator: