Id like to step up to the 6 PPC but theres so many different neck configurations.
Yup. Which should tell you that there is no clear answer. The plus side is competitive winners also use different neck configurations, which also means you can't go too far wrong with any of the more common ones.
i wanna make sure the reamer i purchase is the right one.
Again, there is no clear answer. We've pretty much come to the conclusion that a throat angle of over 2-degrees half cone angle is "fussy". Don't know anybody with the cojones to try a half cone angle less than .75 degrees. Most common is 1.5 degrees. For right now, that'll work...
Similar things with clearance at the case head, and at the other end, freebore diameter. Current fashion (perhaps) is to use rather more neck clearance and rather less freebore diameter clearance that a few years ago. For example (and that only), more and more people are using .002+ neck clearance, and .0005 freebore diameter clearance (measured off the bullet pressure ring, not nominal diameter). As this is a bit new, the consequences of that compromise are appearing -- See a Greg Walley post, for example.
OK, enough. The point I'm trying to make is whatever good decisions you make now, and you will, if you follow Wilbur's advice, you will change your mind later, or at least, get curious and try something different. You will buy another reamer or two. Possibly a different action -- there are differences, not so much in performance capabilities, but in use.
Etc. on just about everything.
By all means go to a few matches.
Get the better books on the subject. Not so much to tell you how to do things -- you're already a gunsmith -- but to tell you the kinds of things people pay attention to. Not just the system we term "rifle," but the environment it has to operate in.
One interesting book is the
Benchrest Shooting Primer
http://www.amazon.com/Benchrest-Shooting-Primer-Dave-Brennan/dp/0967094879
Not for current, up-to-date information, but to see how various people have, over time solved (struggled?) with the questions you raise.
There are a couple current books, one by Tony Boyer, one by Mike Ratigan, that are suppose to be first-rate for understanding the competitive side of benchrest.
I suppose it's a bias of mine, but I think books are better than the internet for a lot of information, including basic information. Several people have gone over the text, culling it for errors and confusions. More time has been spent trying to get everything that's important, and time has been spent finding better ways to communicate that information.
The Internet is better for the very latest information (which I'm suggesting, is not relevant to your situation).
Finally, welcome. I hope you enjoy benchrest, and after a while, will add to what we know.
Charles