C
cadillacjack
Guest
I believe the objective is to strive to attain the highest degree of accuracy possible. To meet this objective it requires a combination of the best ammo, gun, and shooter. In further of this objective I test new ammo, accessories, and techniques constantly. THIS IS NOT ALL I DO. On the other hand I simply like shooting and have a number of non-benchrest guns also for my pleasure and enjoyment. The objectives of these guns are plinkeng, hunting and simply getting together with others to shoot rocks, cans, deer, rabbits,squirrels and other forms of competitive shooting. Suffice it to say I LIKE SHOOTING, any type,any where, and any time. However, I don't confuse one type of shooting with another. Many on this forum have suggested some great forms of competitive shooting that does't cost an arm and a leg; and all of them sound like they would be fun and challenging (e.g.see Bill Wynne's Fun-FIRE shoots in Tx.) I hope to shoot some of these targets this summer. However, this IS NOT RIMFIRE BENCHREST SHOOTING. It requires shooters to compromise the objective of rimfire benchrest which is to attain the highest degree of accuracy possible.
The point of this thread is not to degrade any form of shooting nor is it to suggest that one is more difficult than the other, it's simply pointing out that one form should not be confused with another. Experience has shown me that it is much more difficult to hit a 2" target with open sights than to shoot a 100 on an ARA target. For what it's worth. Fred
The point of this thread is not to degrade any form of shooting nor is it to suggest that one is more difficult than the other, it's simply pointing out that one form should not be confused with another. Experience has shown me that it is much more difficult to hit a 2" target with open sights than to shoot a 100 on an ARA target. For what it's worth. Fred