New t-32

H

hailey

Guest
So are we going to see this new powder from hodgdons this year.I have never seen the old lots of T-32 is it a stick or ball powder and will we be able to buy a couple hundred pounds at a time.If there only making 20,000 pounds and thats it do I need to sign up now to get any.....
 
Haily

You do know that for every shooter that won something using "T" powder, ther were MULTITUDES that were down in the middle and at the bottom of the pack.

I can remember at some of the Crawfish matches in Louisianna, shooters from other parts of the Country scrambling to borrow some 133 because the "T'" just would not work in that inviroment.

I commend Lou Murdica for putting forth the effort in getting Hogdon to take this step. But, contrary to popular belief, there is nothing "magical" about "T". It still takes the same amount of dedication to get it working, and keep it working, as it does other powders..........jackie
 
i sorta agree with jackie. other than being a useable BENCHREST powder it has one additional advantage over the other powders i have used in the past. it meters through a harrels powder measure like they were made for each other. it is, without a doubt, the most uniform THROWN powder i have used. this adds just a little more unifornity to your charges and as we all know every little bit helps.
i'm on the buyers list.

mike in co
 
What are the chances - -

It will be EXACTLY like the old T? I would guess slim to none but hope springs eternal in the hearts of Man.
 
new T

All I know is if it can be done, Lou will get it done. I've taken his advice on a lot of occassions and he has never steered me wrong, repeat never. This will be no different.
How many of you wished you had bought a march scope or two when he first brought them in at $1500.00?
 
mike in co

who do I need to talk to to get on this buyers list I sure would hate to get past up on this one...
 
You do know that for every shooter that won something using "T" powder, ther were MULTITUDES that were down in the middle and at the bottom of the pack.

I can remember at some of the Crawfish matches in Louisianna, shooters from other parts of the Country scrambling to borrow some 133 because the "T'" just would not work in that inviroment.

I jackie
I wouldn't say there were MULTITUDES using T, first because there was only 21,000 pounds of what the top shooters recognize as T, and secondly there is very little of that lot T left. The powder called T is just one lot of three lots of powder that Thunderbird sold. As to the remainder, it is/was all IMR8208 and IMR8208M and this is mostly gone.

Like Jackie, I hope Lou does get his powder. I tried for about 2 years, dealing first with IMR Powder Co, then with Hodgdon Powder after they acquired the rights to market IMR powders in the US. (IMR Powder Co is a Canadian company and is located there).

One consideration here, Hodgdon powders are made by mostly ADI in Australia and IMR in Canada). Both of these powder manufacturers use wood pulp as their cellulose source (cellulose + Nitric Acid = gunpowder) (if it were cotton as the cellulose source + Nitric Acid, it would = gun cotton).

Wood as a cellulose source is very variable as to the quality of cellulose it yields. Therefore, there is variability from lot to lot as the resultant output characteristics of the powder produced. For example, one lot could be made from chipper mill sawdust, the next lot could be made of pine chips and needles where a clearcut operation took place.

When I was negotiating with Hodgdon, in 2003, about making a batch of IMR8208M, I was requiring a 500 pound batch to test. I had 5 or so HOF, and T, shooters lined up to test before going into production. Hodgdon refused to make a test batch, with their using wood cellulose, they could not guarantee the 500 pound test batch to have the same characteristics as the production batch, so I did not pursue getting what they offered then as a 16,000-18,000 pound batch. Reason? The batch, like T, T32, T322, GI322 and the various pulldowns sold as 8208 could be from too fast for the 6PPC to too slow for the 6PPC.

Regardless, of the outcome of Lou's effort, if that batch of powder does get made and get to benchrest shooters, it will offer shooters another option.

As Jackie said there are times that VV133 will work and T/8208 will not, BUT, there are times when T/8208 will work and VV133 will not. Joe Krupa, recent inductee into the benchrest HOF, has, many times, switched to 8208 when VV133 would not work, the 2008 IBS Nationals as the most recent example.

At the 2008 IBS Group Nationals, Bill Goad won the LV Grand using T-322, Harley Baker was using VV133. Tony Boyer winner of the HV Grand was using VV133 and Harley Baker was using 8208. Lester Bruno, winner of the HB Grand was shooting T32. Harley Baker won the 2-gun, 3-gun and 4-gun.

At this shoot, 7 of the top 20 in Sporter were shooting T/8208 or one of the variants. Four were shooting T/8208 in HB, in LV four were shooting T/8208, 3 did not report the powder they used. In HV Grand 6 of the top 20 shot T/8208. This proves there is a big demand for an alternative to VV133!!
 
Last edited:
Good post, Jerry...

I have some experience with T and given a choice, would choose it everytime over 133.. There are many that down play the value of T who have little or no experience with it.

I have shot a lot of 133 as well and it also is a super powder for the ppc.. As you said, some environments seem to make one or the other powders respond more favorably.

I'd bet a wooden nickle that if Tony still had a good supply of T that he'd use it forever... I think that holds true for many shooters who have had experience with it...
 
I'd bet a wooden nickle that if Tony still had a good supply of T that he'd use it forever... I think that holds true for many shooters who have had experience with it...
Pat, I think your wooden nickle bet is safe. If Tony, Smiley Hensley, Don Powell, Wayne Campbell and a several others still had a big stockpile of T they wouldn't be shooting VV133!
 
When I first heard about Lou Murdica's potential deal, I said "good". After about 30 seconds, the second thought was, "which T?" I have about 2 pounds of "real T" that I tested against VV133 and the "mid-range" 8208 that I have been shooting for abut 3 years. It was about 50 fps faster than 133, but had a load window as narrow as a razor. The slower 8208 (by nearly 100fps for the same weight) has a load window that you could drive a 18 wheeler through....
 
When I first heard about Lou Murdica's potential deal, I said "good". After about 30 seconds, the second thought was, "which T?" I have about 2 pounds of "real T" that I tested against VV133 and the "mid-range" 8208 that I have been shooting for about 3 years. It was about 50 fps faster than 133, but had a load window as narrow as a razor. The slower 8208 (by nearly 100fps for the same weight) has a load window that you could drive a 18 wheeler through....

Jeff, you have been a top benchrest shooter for many years. Did you shoot any T in your early years and if so, how did it do then?

I talked to Smiley and Don Powell about how their T was and is now. Their answer was that the T they use has changed greatly over the years. Supposedly their T slowed considerably. I wonder if the load window narrowed also?? Dunno.

Looking back to the '80's and early '90's, the equipment lists showed mostly 27.5 grains of T. According to these two guys this brought their powder up to the neck/shoulder intersection. Now they have to bring the volume up much further. Also, looking back to those days you guys were shooting at about 3200-3250fps. Now many shooters blow cases out faster than that!
 
Pat

That is a true statement about Tony Boyer.

I can remember one well known shooter at Kansas City walking around with a container that he had just bought for about $250. It contained about a pound and a half of "T". He was showing it to every body much like many of us show pictures of our Grand Children.

Perhaps I am fortunate that I never had any "T", so I do not lament and yearn for the good old days. Many of us simply shoot what is available........jackie
 
origional T

When we first started shooting T it was called T322 and we bought it from Walt for $56.00 a jug. Walt didn't weigh the jugs when he filled them, he just filled them. There was closer to 9 lbs than 8 lbs in a jug. Later on the price went to $65.00
One year in Phoenix Walt mentioned he was getting close to being out of powder and if we wanted some we had better hurry.
I bought 12 jugs and Lou bought 100 jugs. He said he wanted to get some before the horders got there. I later took Lou's advice and bought (2) 100 lb kegs.
To my knowledge, Lou is still shooting out of the powder he purchased then.
When he made the deal for the new powder to be made, he sent then 4 or 5 unopend jugs for testing. They are matching the burn curve, weight vs velocity and other comparisons.
By the way, the standard T load was 27.2 and it still is.
 
contact

how can I get a hold of lou anybody have a e-mail or phone number??
 
Back
Top