Here's what happened

Wilbur

cook and bottle washer
Nashville to Midland is a scheduled 3 hours. If you travel on "storm day" it takes about 7 hours, all inside the envelope of security and good health. I smoked in my pants just short of Austin. A nights sleep and a couple of phone calls got me to Gene's place Wednesday morning. Gene's tunnel is nicely done. A spacious loading room sits aside the "shooting room" offering 24/7 capability with little effect of external ballistics. The term "little effect" is necessarily stated as a bit of mirage is seen - about half a bullet worth in all directions.

Gene's purpose was to show me how his tuner worked (see attached picture). My purpose was to determine if tuners work on centerfire benchrest rifles period. As it turned out we both got most of what we wanted. Keep in mind that the stated concept is to tune the vertical dispersion of shots and vertical only. Gene can straighten me out on his purpose and the concept as necessary. Moreover, if I got it wrong somewhere, I hope Gene corrects the matter.

My plan was to shoot groups with the tuner installed, adjusting as Gene recommended, and shoot groups with the tuner not installed in the hope that a difference would be seen. In the case of the first rifle, we started with the tuner installed. The groups fired at the initial tuner setting would measure vertically offering an opportunity right off the bat. Gene gave me the skinny on how much to turn the tuner and I played by the numbers. The groups at the new setting were still vertical but smaller. Another 1/8th turn and the vertical vanished for practical purposes. We then removed the tuner and the rifle fired three groups straight without vertical. The best group of all was with the tuner installed but the better consistency was without. Based on what we had observed to this point, a conclusion could be drawn that the tuner can create and remove vertical. Remaining to be seen was whether or not the rifle would fall from tune without the tuner. The day became long and Gene wanted to retreat to the shop where he could make up some parts for trying out the alternate method of adding weight to "stop" the muzzle....so we left the tunnel and headed for the shop.

Gene gathered up some pieces of projects past and we compared them to what we thought we needed. Somewhere along the line I came up with the idea to use his rimfire tuner and tap out some holes for adding washers. Not really my idea at all, but rather one I have seen used on rimfire tuners - some more sophisticated than others but the same concept. Gene bought in and suggested we hit that mexican restaurant after which he would cobble up the stuff. Day over for me - more work for Gene.

One missed turn and another phone call brought us together at the tunnel the following morning. Gene had the "add weight till it works" tuner on the rifle with one of six washers installed. The washers weighed about 2.6 ounces each (see attached picture). We shot groups and added washers along the way. The rifle grouped poorly across the entire effort. The best was with one washer so we went back to that and turned the tuner to and fro looking for a sweet spot but found no sunshine. We then removed the tuner and the rifle performed similarly to the day before - just as good without as it did with the best tuner setting. Submitting that we might not understand all we know, we gave up on this one. Apologies to proponents of this method. We just didn't get close enough to anything good to justify keeping on for the moment. Of interest to me, and I didn't mention it at the time, was the tremendous effect 2.6 ounces had on group size. I'm thinking.....gee whiz, what's going on here?!?! I know that folks have cut off barrels little at the time to see what happens but don't recall reports of this magnitude. Go figure!

I explained to Gene that I really needed to see the rifle fall from tune without the tuner to satisfy my suspicion. Since it was shooting well sans tuner at the moment we turned to another rifle. To make a long story short, this rifle performed best with the tuner installed. Further, it was clear (as before) that the tuner was capable of minimizing vertical shot dispersion. When the tuner was removed, the groups were vertical. Gene stated, and I agreed, that the vertical could be tuned out with the load. Right there I made an assumption that I didn't need to see the other rifle fall from tune to conclude that a tuner can be useful. That assumption may or may not be flawed but I think for now that "not flawed" is the case. To be flawed, it would have to be true that rifles do not fall from tune and I don't think that is credible. Rifles do exist that refuse to drop out of tune but we have all seen rifles setting the world on fire just before they hit the wall - out of tune for the lack of an alternate explanation.

Somewhere along there we called it quits, ate a steak and bid farewell.

Soooooo.....here's what I learned......A tuner can indeed minimize vertical shot dispersion.

This rambling wouldn't be complete (as if it ever had a chance) without comments concerning function. A tuner could easily be adjusted and a group fired within the allowed time. My experience leaves me with the opinion that an actual on the clock adjustment would be a distraction of significance as would/could thinking about making an adjustment. A mental discipline derived from experience would have to be developed. When, where and why would be critical considerations to avoid a crash....not at all unlike that knob on our powder drops. The difference in the two being the availability between the commence and cease fire commands. Using the powder drop for tuning, it's a done deal when you seat the bullets. With a tuner, it's not a done deal until the cease fire command. Could be good, could be bad, depending on too many factors to weigh for now. Gene's method of using DA sounds promising. If it proves out, life will be simpler and the top 20 will be tighter.
 

Attachments

  • tuner.JPG
    tuner.JPG
    12.5 KB · Views: 1,365
  • weights.jpg
    weights.jpg
    20.6 KB · Views: 939
Here comes the questions

MasterChefAndBottleWasher said:
One missed turn and another phone call brought us together at the tunnel the following morning. Gene had the "add weight till it works" tuner on the rifle with one of six washers installed. The washers weighed about 2.6 ounces each (see attached picture). We shot groups and added washers along the way. The rifle grouped poorly across the entire effort. The best was with one washer so we went back to that and turned the tuner to and fro looking for a sweet spot but found no sunshine.
Using the rimfire tuner was any effort made to lock the outer cylinder down? It is easy to see where the "rattle' of this tuner design makes it not suitable for centerfire if the outer cylinder is not locked down.
 
I'm with Jerry

The tuner body must be 100% locked to the barrel. I don't even feel that a jam nut, on the barrel, behind the tuner is really sufficient. And I also don't like pinch screws. I feel like a tuner body need to lock firmly, at the muzzle, to work well.

Shelley
 
Wilbur

All you had to do was watch Dusty Stevens shoot at the South East Region 4-Gun last fall to see that there are Rifles that will shoot,and continue to shoot, regardless of what is going on. I doubt the addition of a tuner, or anything else, would cause that Rifle to improve, because you can only get so good.
That being said, there are the rest of us, living with what ever the good Lord decides we deserve at the moment. In our cases, the addition of a tuner, in the hands of a shooter who is willing to use it, can be a great asset in keeping the Rifle shooting at a competitive level throughout the week end.
For the past three years, shooters have constantly asked me, "does that thing really work". I guess staying at the top on a fairly consistant bases simply is not good enough answer. It certainly isn't on there for looks. And considering all I had to go through to allow the extra weight, I could have lived without the tuner.
I am glad many are finding out what several of us have known for going on four years. Thanks for the report........jackie
 
Rock solid sounds good. Do you have such an animal?

How did you BBQ the Solid Rock?

Next time you come up to Bristol, I'll take you to Ridgewood...best BBQ in the Nation according to Southern Living Magazine and the late Dale Earnhart Sr.

(Do I have a Hoehn/Harrell rimfire tuner? Yes. I've even got one of those really slick magnet thingies)

Ever try to BBQ a magnet??
2wn1ukl.jpg
 
Using the rimfire tuner was any effort made to lock the outer cylinder down? It is easy to see where the "rattle' of this tuner design makes it not suitable for centerfire if the outer cylinder is not locked down.

Jerry, this is a good question and one that I am well aware of. The tuner that I used as the basis for this experiment is well made and I was unable to detect any movement in the outer part, but as you stated, on a centerfire rifle there is some question about whether or not there is any 'rattle.'

I intend to fabricate a one piece, solid aluminum mount for the washers and will give this type of tuner one more chance to prove itself before abandoning the project entirely. I have already proven my tuner design beyond any shadow of doubt and have no plans to make any changes; it works!

In fairness to Bill Calfee, I feel I am obligated to build a tuner exactly as he says and give it my best shot. We will see.

Later,

Gene Beggs
 
Jerry, this is a good question and one that I am well aware of. The tuner that I used as the basis for this experiment is well made and I was unable to detect any movement in the outer part, but as you stated, on a centerfire rifle there is some question about whether or not there is any 'rattle.'


Later,

Gene Beggs
Gene, on the tuner I show above, if you take the O-rings out that tuner has about 0.008" free-play (rattle) between the outside sleeve and the base unit. This gave some wild results on a centerfire I tried it on in 2005. It worked fine on a rimfire shooting match velocity ammunition and that is what this tuner is designed for.
 
Wilbur and others....

Here's what I get from the "tests" and comments:

Tuners will remove vertical....but not always.

Tuners work on all rifles...but not always.

Locking down the tuner parts helps...but not always.

Making an adjustment in the tuner will affect group size...but not always.

Some rifles shoot better than others...but not always.
 
Thanks Wilbur

Wilbur, thank you for your well written and unbiased report on your trip to Texas. It was a pleasure and honor to have you as my guest. You are always welcome at my place and I look forward to shooting with you again.

We of the benchrest community greatly appreciate your dedication and hard work on our behalf as the sponsor and webmaster of Benchrest Central.

Thank you my friend. :)

Sincerely

Gene Beggs
 
Here's what I get from the "tests" and comments:

Tuners will remove vertical....but not always.

Tuners work on all rifles...but not always.

Locking down the tuner parts helps...but not always.

Making an adjustment in the tuner will affect group size...but not always.

Some rifles shoot better than others...but not always.

And PACecil is a condescending AS*****, but not always.

Seriously, if you don't like the reports, if they are too non-scientific for your tender sensibilities, if you think we are all to dumb to objectively explore this subject, why don't you get off your dead ass, define some experiments, order the required equipment and obtain your own results. But, if you are not going to offer anything constructive, do us a favor and keep you pie hole shut.
 
And PACecil is a condescending AS*****, but not always.

Seriously, if you don't like the reports, if they are too non-scientific for your tender sensibilities, if you think we are all to dumb to objectively explore this subject, why don't you get off your dead ass, define some experiments, order the required equipment and obtain your own results. But, if you are not going to offer anything constructive, do us a favor and keep you pie hole shut.

Well put Mike
 
Here is the $$$$ question....

Wilbur, were your findings significant enough that we will see you at the line with or without tuner(s) on your rifle(s) for the '08 shooting year or is the jusry still out for deliberation?????

Linc
 
Good report Wilbur,

I don't mean to sounds like I am being critical here, just a genuine thought.

I can totally see that a tuner can tune the barrel to the load rather than tuning the load to the barrel in the time honoured fashion. That being the case it is logical that the rifle will go out of tune in the same manner it does if load tuning and at the same DA reading. The tuner now needs to be reset instead of the load reset.

So you are a little unsure that the rifle is tuned so you take more ammo to the line to test with and tweak the tuner settings while on the clock.

If you are unsure the rifle will be in tune and feel that with increased DA you will need to make an adjustment on the line then why not just take two loads to the line, make a quick test (no mechanical messing about) and determine what seems to be shooting better and then go to the record with the ammo block that contains the preferred load ??

Seems like you end up in the same place, same amount of ammo, same number of shots fired only without the need to be messing with the mechanics of the rifle on the line and on the clock.

Used with the "system" whereby the DA is checked and the tuner tweaked to suit you would ideally avoid the setting changing on the line but then the same holds true if tuning the load using the DA checking system to determine where the load needs to be.

What am I missing with respect to the tangible benefit a lightweight tuner offers over load tuning only ?

Seems to me the muzzle stopping approach so that the load change with ambient conditions would be a non issue is the real area where tuners would offer a big gain, if in fact that is do-able with a centrefire. Hmmmmm ......... I see that Bill just bumped his muzzle stopping posts to the top, I have no tuner experience but I'd have to agree that muzzle stopping is the way tuners are really going to make any real impact on aggs in the long run.

Bryce
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Bryce,....

....here is where I feel a tuner will be helpful, but before I go any further, no Jackie I have never used one in the "arena of competition." But I have shot in the said arena and have experience with the way the game is played, although limited.

I feel like you Bryce in that I have shot a tuner on my rimfire gun and in rimfire competition, and have shot some other guns including Calfee built rimfire rifles. When a rimfire is in tune and the muzzle stopped you still need to match lots/speeds with ambient conditions to maximize your effort.

In centerfire here is where I feel you could gain some help from a tuner....say you went to the line with 10 shells of a specific load and quickly realized that the load was wrong, a tweak here or there of the tuner could save your group. The other way to go about this would be to load say, 25 shells that had 7 of 3 different loads with 4 foulers. If one load was way off, try another. Would the tuner be easier??? Having never used one, I will defer to those in the 'know'.

My opinion is that it will be a different way to skin the perverbial cat, this year I anticipate many still tuning the load and others tuning the tuner to get the most of the situation. Time will tell. I find it hard to believe that Calfee or anyone could find the correct weight of muzzle attatched tuner to "stop" the barrel to a degree that a person could shoot the same bullet, powder charge, seating depth for an entire day/season of centerfire BR. I would love to be shown different.

Linc
 
Tuners ....Shmuners

it's all making my a** tired. Will they make your bullets "arc"?

...Dave
 
So, all in all we could say that Wilbur is NOT "Convinced" as the original thread asked.

We could also say that if you are too accurate in your interpretation of what Wilbur said, folks will jump down your throat immediately. How dare you to actually read what he wrote! Hehehe. It's funny.

I wonder how many here actually read what Wilbur said, rather than reading what they wanted to read... Keep in mind, Wilbur could run for office with his ability to pacify all opinions. Well done Wilbur.

Thanks both to Wilbur and Gene for presenting their respective set of opinions, and taking the time and spending the money to share what they saw.
/edit/
On the subject of not needing any proof of what is going on...
I also especially liked the statements in other threads that you don't need to understand why they work, you just try it and like magic it somehow reduces group size.

It reminds me of a line from a movie long ago, anyone remember Eugene Levy in "Armed and Dangerous"?

"Your honor, I really think that in this case, the facts are completely irrelevant..." :D :D :D :D :D
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Dave,

According to what I've heard, "arcing" was just an old hotrod term that described a car or anything else in perfect tune. The folks at the warehouse used it thus.


al
 
Dave,

According to what I've heard, "arcing" was just an old hotrod term that described a car or anything else in perfect tune. The folks at the warehouse used it thus.


al

I understand their use of "arcing" was literally arcing the bullet with a squib load, which would also explain why their zeroes were not repeatable outdoors.
 
Back
Top