For sure Wayne .... its pure fun to fiddle with yet another element, such as making a good 40 pound portable bench, even if I KNOW a good 500 pound concrete one is a little easier to shoot off. In the end, I still feel that when shooting outdoors, the most important cause of wider shots is missing a wind change, and bad shots can occasionally result in a half-inch or greater miss, but in my experience with light benches and simple front and rear rests, misses from unsteady aim are hard to pinpoint, and likely of smaller consequence than wind judging error. To me, its still really the fun factor of trying to use home-made gear to get decent results, with posting higher and higher scores not as high on my list.
While at the Az. match, I spoke with Fredric Axelson, owner of the FX airgun company about bench shooting in Sweden, and he told me they mostly shoot their guns off the bench "hand held", with no special rests at all. Now, its likely the game over there will eventually move to more sophisticated equipment as it "progresses", but only after it grows more. And so it is over here, in a way, as for now, I bet more shooters shot with informal support setups, and a good opportunity to bring in both non-benchrest shooters AND experienced power burner BR guys might be by including a more "open equipment" game plan.
See, its my feeling that perhaps encouraging use of light benches and simple rests will tend to help equalize the impact of high zoot guns and scopes, in effect leveling scores a little, which might be a good thing for growth of the shooter base.
Yes, its the opposite of my quest three years ago for better and better accuracy, because back , my interest was mostly just to see how tight I could get a gun to shoot at fifty yards, and now that i think I know that answer, I'm focusing more on match type shooting, and making it more fun for more airgunners.