W
Wayne Burns
Guest
Recent threads have caused me to wonder where our sport might be going..
There seems to be a strong warning coming from one of our most experienced air gun guy, LD, that if we put all our eggs in the “Postal’ matches basket, the game will be lost in the long run.
Instead of sniping personal comments attacking each other, maybe we should consider the ideas presented here.
Do we lose something by making it too easy to compete from afar… and can ANY postal match really be called a “completion”. I personally see postal matches as “just another reason to get some shooting in” .. but not a “real completion”, instead an interesting comparison. Any reason to shoot is good for me. But…
“Shoulder to Shoulder” matches are for sure more real comparisons since conditions are more the same, although there is still differences between which bench one shoots on… and even which relay one shoots in on that day.. but still a better way to “test” the competitors.
Not only is this a better way to test competitors, “shoulder to shoulder”, matches also provide a communion of folks with common interests. Coming together to discuss issues and just in general BS about air guns and the shooting sports over good food and drinks, is the real loss, and the one that may cause the long term downfall of our sport.
I personally feel we can have a combination of the too, but I think we really need to focus more on local matches and get more of them happening. I’d like the postal matches to be a combination of at least three different location outdoor matches. These matches might not be real competitions when we mail in the cards, but they are real for the shooters at that local match. And collecting that info and comparing it on a world wide basis should be good for growing the sport overall. It's still exciting to see what other folks are doing across the waters or even in your own country, even though it's not a true comparison.
That would take developing more places to shoot close to where you already shoot, and attracting more shooters to these matches. How would we do that? What are your ideas about this? Let’s focus on these questions and stop sniping at each other please.. How can that be good for the sport in anyway? While you consider these questions, I'll be shooting at our local match today.. I'll check for comments tonight
Wayne Burns,
Match Director,
Ashland Air Rifle Range
There seems to be a strong warning coming from one of our most experienced air gun guy, LD, that if we put all our eggs in the “Postal’ matches basket, the game will be lost in the long run.
Instead of sniping personal comments attacking each other, maybe we should consider the ideas presented here.
Do we lose something by making it too easy to compete from afar… and can ANY postal match really be called a “completion”. I personally see postal matches as “just another reason to get some shooting in” .. but not a “real completion”, instead an interesting comparison. Any reason to shoot is good for me. But…
“Shoulder to Shoulder” matches are for sure more real comparisons since conditions are more the same, although there is still differences between which bench one shoots on… and even which relay one shoots in on that day.. but still a better way to “test” the competitors.
Not only is this a better way to test competitors, “shoulder to shoulder”, matches also provide a communion of folks with common interests. Coming together to discuss issues and just in general BS about air guns and the shooting sports over good food and drinks, is the real loss, and the one that may cause the long term downfall of our sport.
I personally feel we can have a combination of the too, but I think we really need to focus more on local matches and get more of them happening. I’d like the postal matches to be a combination of at least three different location outdoor matches. These matches might not be real competitions when we mail in the cards, but they are real for the shooters at that local match. And collecting that info and comparing it on a world wide basis should be good for growing the sport overall. It's still exciting to see what other folks are doing across the waters or even in your own country, even though it's not a true comparison.
That would take developing more places to shoot close to where you already shoot, and attracting more shooters to these matches. How would we do that? What are your ideas about this? Let’s focus on these questions and stop sniping at each other please.. How can that be good for the sport in anyway? While you consider these questions, I'll be shooting at our local match today.. I'll check for comments tonight
Wayne Burns,
Match Director,
Ashland Air Rifle Range
Last edited by a moderator: