Vern
Morethan1waytoskinacat
I was recently talking with a friend who has transitioned from short range center fire benchrest to also doing rimfire.
I have held the opinion that the reason that CF BR has dwindled is the great expense.
I have been considering ANOTHER additional shooting sport that has even more matches.
I have only shot 1 long range match, that with a friends rifle and took first.
But I know the expense is every bit as much as SR CF BR.
I thought because of the lack of loading expenses that rimfire might be less. HOWEVER my friend told me that the cost for shooting Rimfire was much greater than CF BR.
Is this true. I dont want to doubt my friends word but from what little I can accertain I dont see how.
I know the guns are every bit as expensive. His partial explanation was that even though you dont have the same reloading expense that the ammo expense is even greater.
Is the overall expense greater.
I do like the idea of being able to shoot more and loading less.
I have held the opinion that the reason that CF BR has dwindled is the great expense.
I have been considering ANOTHER additional shooting sport that has even more matches.
I have only shot 1 long range match, that with a friends rifle and took first.
But I know the expense is every bit as much as SR CF BR.
I thought because of the lack of loading expenses that rimfire might be less. HOWEVER my friend told me that the cost for shooting Rimfire was much greater than CF BR.
Is this true. I dont want to doubt my friends word but from what little I can accertain I dont see how.
I know the guns are every bit as expensive. His partial explanation was that even though you dont have the same reloading expense that the ammo expense is even greater.
Is the overall expense greater.
I do like the idea of being able to shoot more and loading less.