MColeman
Club Coordinator
This is just an oddity. On the several of the recent "Douglas barrel" threads, much has been made of the notion that you don't see them in the top 10 of match reports. So I went looking in the 1,000 yard match reports (Stan Taylor is one of the 50 or so people with a Long Range Marksman jacket), and sure enough, there they were.
But that got me to thinking. You don't see "Hart" for barrel in the match reports very often either, these days. Back when I was starting out in benchrest, that's all I'd use, 'cause that's what the top shooters used. Quick! How many think Hart isn't as good anymore?
But wait, there's more. The next gotta-have barrel was Shilen. Everybody used them. Until that became Kreiger. Is it Bartlien now? Anybody got some new Hart or Shilen blanks they'll sell me real cheap? They sure aren't prominent in the match reports anymore, so aren't worth as much, right? To be a nice guy, I'll give you $100 for a new blank -- best grade -- of either. You can thank me later.
Kinda sounds like, uh, what's those little rodents called.......it's on the tip of my tongue........I got it! Lemmings.
Wannabe's that scour the equipment lists to see what the winners use seem to be under the impression that it's the equipment that creates winners. It's the fastidious attention to detail in learning to tune their equipment and weeks of practice by the winners that puts the barrel makers name on the equipment list. I firmly believe that it's hard to find a bad barrel maker these days.
Bottom line; nobody knows what makes a barrel a great (hummer) barrel. You can buy 5 Kriegers, Bartleins, Harts, Shilens, Douglas, etc. and there will probably be one of every group that shoots better than the others. Otherwise why would Tony B. go through so many barrels a year just to find one or two great ones?