Sever years ago one of our equipment suppliers was touting the benefits of cryoing wear parts on our crushing equipment, benefits being extended wear life. They explained reduced labor cost changing out parts, ect. The salesman had some golf balls that had been frozen. He dropped a non treated and a treated ball from the same distance and the treated ball bounced much higher that the non treated. When you hit the treated ball with a golf club it was like hitting a rock. Also illegal. Anyhow we gave it a try on some parts. The problem was too many variables to do a good comparison. Sometimes you are working a different area of the pit and the ledge wears the parts different. Also, dry material doesn't wear the parts as much as wet or damp material. After a couple of sets in one of the crushers we decided there was no advantage to offset the increased cost of cryoing the part.
And just so you know Francis, when we dropped a treated and non treated 300# part they both bounced about the same.
Later
Dave