jackie schmidt
New member
I have heard conflicting reports.
Jackie they cyro once now. They use to cyro 2 times. They felt there was no advantage to doing it 2 times. Just added more time and cost to do it twice.
John
Why? They know it helps a little with machining, but?
Check first as most cryo places do not have the best facilities to do it.
https://ctpcryogenics.com/
They do excellent cryo, but they know more than the barrel cryo guys.
I hope it's not a scam this time.
It does something.
Plenty of experienced machinists that actually turn dials think so.
The bigger problem is defining what it does in a quantifiable way.
"Tool life is longer" is a sort of fuzzy thing.
At what cuts and feeds?
All?
Some?
Heavy?
Light?
What quality of material?
There are so many variable in this kind of stuff it gets very hard to
establish a way to measure and quantify it.
Deciding when to switch from HSS tooling to Carbide tooling in Aluminum is a real PITA.
Carbide is never as 'sharp' as quality HSS.
One of the reasons has long been though to be the grain size in carbide.
How smooth a cut do you want?
How fast?
How many cuts (and the amount of metal removed) are you going to make in a production lot?
Personally, I'm not interested in tool life. I want a barrel that shoots. If it costs extra for tooling, so be it.
If you do ANY precision machining you better be interested in tool life.
Or do you want to replace a cutting tool after every pass?
We actually encountered this problem a couple time.
One pass to cut threads and the tool edge was shot.
We had to switch to a very precision grinding system with diamond abrasive on shaped steel wheels.
It was on of those rare 'cost is not an issue' and 'just make it work.
We only needed to produce about 10 pieces.
And most of them ended up as spares.
We used to do a lot of things once and only made one item.
If a barrel shoots lights out and the tooling cost an extra $100 bucks why would you worry? Would you rather spend extra $$ for more bbls and less for tooling? Theoretically speaking.
Presumably that $100 is spread out over a number of barrels.
Say for instance you buy 10 barrels over a few years. 3 of those aren't competitive, and 3 shoot really well. The other 4 are just so- so.
What are the 3 really good ones worth to you after you figure in consumables trying to make all 10 shoot plus basically junking 3 after purchase price and chambering? Your time not included.
Say for instance you buy 10 barrels over a few years. 3 of those aren't competitive, and 3 shoot really well. The other 4 are just so- so.
What are the 3 really good ones worth to you after you figure in consumables trying to make all 10 shoot plus basically junking 3 after purchase price and chambering? Your time not included.
Say for instance you buy 10 barrels over a few years. 3 of those aren't competitive, and 3 shoot really well. The other 4 are just so- so.
What are the 3 really good ones worth to you after you figure in consumables trying to make all 10 shoot plus basically junking 3 after purchase price and chambering? Your time not included.
But will a $100 tooling surcharge guarantee you will receive a "hummer" barrel? Can most barrel makers make a "hummer" barrel at will?