R
retired
Guest
LET THE DISCUSSION BEGIN, and why you do it your way
I dial in on the top of the lands, ultimately that's what the pilot is going to run on and follow, but I do make sure the groove is concentric with the lands, you might be surprised how many aren't.
Matt P
I dial in on the top of the lands, ultimately that's what the pilot is going to run on and follow, but I do make sure the groove is concentric with the lands, you might be surprised how many aren't.
Matt P
If one assumes it is the bulk of the barrel ahead of the throat that is going to have the most influence on what happens to the bullet once the cap is busted then why are we worried about the metal we are going to ream out of for the chamber? It seems to me it's likely the last two or 4" of the barrel that does the most to influence where the bullet goes. Just something to think about.
Pete
yes i indicate at the throat where the bullet enters the bore/bbl.
i want he entry to be as square to the bore as possible.
I guess it depends on how you chamber a bbl. My two places to indicate are the throat and the crown. When indicating the throat I always check ahead of the throat the length of the bearing surface of the bullet. If that's good I'm ready to drill and bore. Why indicate what your going to be drilling out? You can indicate in three places depending on your method of chambering.
The rear of the chamber, the throat, and the crown. But you can only use two. If you do all three then your bending the bbl.
Richard
that matters when there is 18 or more inches that will influence what the bullet does once it leaves the throat? I'm not arguing but want to hear why you thing it's that important?
Thanks,
Pete
but a lot of people only indicate the chamber end to the Gnat's butt and they seem to get the same results we do. This is what brings the question to my mind about the whole business of throat. Mos barrels are bananas, to some degree.
Pete
but don't use em because of the slop between the bushings and the rod itself. I went to using gauge pins in each end and call it good when I get both ends running true. So far, it has worked out fine. I had an indicator I could reach a 30 BR throat with but never used it so sold it to a friend. SO far, all the CF barrels I have chambered have shot small ones. I just question the whole throat thing I guess..I have around 500 pieces of 30 BR brass that will all chamber in the barrels I have reamed because I use a piece if of it as a Go gauge. Chamber until the bolt closes with a bit of feel and we're home. I have had chabers done by others in the past that I could see were not cut perfectly concentric and the rifles still shot excellently, only one or two but nevertheless - - -.
A Smith of some note told me he once chambered a barrel using a 3 jaw chuck and the barrel shot just fine. So, one has to wonder a bit.
Pete
If one assumes it is the bulk of the barrel ahead of the throat that is going to have the most influence on what happens to the bullet once the cap is busted then why are we worried about the metal we are going to ream out of for the chamber? It seems to me it's likely the last two or 4" of the barrel that does the most to influence where the bullet goes. Just something to think about.
Pete
but don't use em because of the slop between the bushings and the rod itself. I went to using gauge pins in each end and call it good when I get both ends running true. So far, it has worked out fine. I had an indicator I could reach a 30 BR throat with but never used it so sold it to a friend. SO far, all the CF barrels I have chambered have shot small ones. I just question the whole throat thing I guess..I have around 500 pieces of 30 BR brass that will all chamber in the barrels I have reamed because I use a piece if of it as a Go gauge. Chamber until the bolt closes with a bit of feel and we're home. I have had chabers done by others in the past that I could see were not cut perfectly concentric and the rifles still shot excellently, only one or two but nevertheless - - -.
A Smith of some note told me he once chambered a barrel using a 3 jaw chuck and the barrel shot just fine. So, one has to wonder a bit.
Pete
I had a carbon wrapped barrel from a local manufacturer on a good hunting rifle, it would do the 2 touching then one at least 1-1.25 moa away trick...
The throat & chamber looked drunk, you could clearly see the remnants of two of the six lands in the freebore/throat & the chamber dialed up poorly
I had it straightened significantly by another smith as a favour & knowledge building experience for both of us
I'm not a smith & didn't chamber it, my regular smith did, he builds a lot of rifles for me including my bench guns that shoot great
It still wouldn't shoot & the throat still looked drunk.....
I gave up, cut the barrel up & had it measured by another smith with good enough gear, once again for a knowledge building exercise.
Groove Diameter was 0.2849
Bore Diameter was 0.2772
The land heights were
1. 37.79 thou
2. 36.61 thou
3. 38.58 thou
4. 21.25 thou
5. 37.40 thou
6. 39.76 thou
It became blatantly obvious why the throat always looked drunk, the chamber wasn't as straight as it could have been & the remnants of two lands in the throat.
It was chambered off the lands, who knows if it would have shot if it had been dialed up & chambered different, pretty hard to do now its in 4 bits
Cost me a huge amount of money but it will never happen again from that manufacturer & no I wasn't the only on with a "special" barrel from them
It was a button barrel, I guess this sort of thing just happens from time to time....