One thing I really liked at my previous home club (Poulsbo Sportsman Club) was that there was always a safety officer present. The club did not open without a safety officer and was closed, when the safety officer left. There was after hours shooting but that also required one of those present to be an experienced club safety officer. Our safety officers were very active, walking up and down the line, watching how the shooters were following (or not following) safety rules and even giving tips on safety measures that might not have been club rules. Anyone failing to follow the safety officer's instructions was subject to being ejected from the range for a day and even up to being banned for life, if there was a serious infraction. Minor infractions such as crossing the safety line when the line was cold would result in a warning but could escalate to ejection if repeated after a warning. The safety officer had the authority to eject any member or guest at his or her discretion. In five years as a member there I never saw an incident where the safety officer abused that authority. That was back when I was shooting regularly two to four hours a day, three or four days a week.
I will always remember seeing and hearing a safety officer walk up to a bench, look down and say, "I see so many violations here, I don't know where to start." I was new to the club. I had seen what the shooter was doing and was glad to see the safety officer take such a direct approach. There were drawbacks to the layout of the ranges and there were never enough benches on the rimfire range but I always felt safe there. Sometimes I heard paying guests and even members complain about all of the rules. I was always pleased to see such a person collect his gear and leave in a huff.
Sure we had a list of rules that each member or guest had to read and initial but it was the presence of a safety officer with absolute authority that kept everything going along smoothly. I went through the safety officer training but found acting as a safety officer boring. I realized I would much rather be shooting than watching others shoot. It gave me great respect for those who were willing to give up their shooting time for a measly $5 an hour off their yearly dues. Our safety officers worked one or two four hour shifts per week. No one did it for the money. They did it to keep the club operating.
One of the first differences I noticed, when I joined TRRC, was the general absence of a safety officer's presence. I also noticed how many long time members showed a casual attitude toward such rules as staying behind the safety line while the range is cold and even handling firearms when the line is cold. Still, I cannot imagine anyone at TRRC shooting at another member's target much less wind flags or club property.
You would think we were all adults but it seems that most people need some kind of an authority figure present to keep them acting like adults. What a pity!
I've been a member of clubs with, and without RSO's present at the ranges. At one of them, the range was gated and locked, so no one could even get to the line unless an RSO was there. The other has several different rifle/pistol ranges on the property that are open to members whenever they wish to shoot, no RSO's. The first example was shot up on a daily basis. My brother in law is still the head RSO there now, and spends most of his time repairing all of the stuff that gets shot up. The other example has few problems with members shooting the place up. Whats the difference? The first example costs $150 to join, and annual dues of $150/year. The latter costs $3500+ to join, and annual dues of $450. I'm no rich guy, and $3,500 was hard for me to part with at the time, but I was fed up with the yahoos at the other range. The point is this: When you have some real money/time/work invested in anything, you are more likely to treat it well, unlike when something is offered for little or nothing.