Why don't you like my Mod 70 Classic

All great information fellow shooters. But I get under 1"MOA frequently ? Is it a fluke? I had a Timney trigger installed and a bedding job done.This BBL seems to like bullets jammed into rifling lands.One thing for sure is it collects to copper quite easily . I fill the bbl with "Wipe out" it comes out a deep navy blue 8 hours later after less then 30 rnds .


OK, a clarification on "getting under moa"....... you state that you do this "frequently" and I trust this to be true.

IMO, to actually quantify this you must shoot a minimum of FIVE groups of FIVE shots each on a given day with a given load...... then you average these 5 groups to get something called the "aggregate" score. You measure them honestly with a caliper, you DO NOT measure outside/outside and subtract a bullet diameter because the holes in the paper don't equal a bullet diameter. You first measure some bullet holes and use this dimension to subtract for group size.

IF these 25 shots ALL average out to be under 1moa then you can honestly say that "My rifle agg'd XXXmoa with this load on this day."

Absolutely no "called fliers" or "dropped shots" or nuttin'. You shoots your foulers on another target and you count EVERY shot for the record.

5-shot groups...

EVERY shot...

5 times in a row...

average...


al
 
Ok now I have some thing to shoot for next time at range

Dang no holds bard ! Lately the speer 150 gr have been shooting very consistently.
 
It's like saying "I can drink 5 beers in 5 minutes" vs. "I can drink 25 beers in 25 minutes"

Different kettle of fish...:eek:

Ben
 
Say what you will about accuracy, the Winchester model 70 pre 64 is Americana and a very fine rifle. I regret that I have never owned one.

Concho Bill
 
Say what you will about accuracy, the Winchester model 70 pre 64 is Americana and a very fine rifle.
...but the only @#*& rifle that ever bit me - damn guide rib! I had my thumb over the top of the action of the first one I opened the bolt on. :eek:
 
Say what you will about accuracy, the Winchester model 70 pre 64 is Americana and a very fine rifle. I regret that I have never owned one.
Concho Bill

It's never too late, Bill.

I've owned a bunch of them and suggest you get started soon on acquiring some of your own.
 
I have been collecting, hunting and shooting pre-64 since before they were called pre-64. They and Mausers have been and will remain my all time favorite hunting rifles of my life. I have shot them in competition in National Match across the course and prone at 1,000 yards.

From the bench I would not even consider any factory mass produced action no matter who did the work or what they did with the action. For every reason that has been stated above, don't waste your money. Buy a good custom action and have a rifle built on a good custom action and only by a top BR smith. You don't have the money? Save your money until you do, or buy a good used bench rifle and have it re barreled if needed.

One point that has not been addressed, it cost the same to shoot the best components through the best rifles as it does through the also ran. :)
 
What are the reasons a Model# 70 can't be made to shot as well as any other action?

No reason. I have two F Class rifles built on M70 actions (one pf, and one crf). The M70 action is actually stiffer than a M700 action. What the M700 has going for it is it's symetrical design which is easier for gunsmiths to work on.

Don
 
What are the reasons a Model# 70 can't be made to shot as well as any other action?

No reason. I have two F Class rifles built on M70 actions (one pf, and one crf). The M70 action is actually stiffer than a M700 action. What the M700 has going for it is it's symetrical design which is easier for gunsmiths to work on.

Don
 
Dad just gave me a beautiful model 70 featherweight classic in 257 Roberts that has never been scoped or even fired. He bought it back in the mid-eighties as an investment and its been in the gun cabinet ever since. Gotta admit, it is a beautiful rifle. Now he wants me to go trade it in on a Remington pump but how do I know what its really worth?:eek:

No way Ginner all do respects to your father but there's no way I'd ever trade-off a Model 70 for a pump nothing especially a Rem. The Robt is a fine ctg., and even if it shot MOA I would not trade it for a pump.I don't own a M70 got stuck on the Rem train but M70's are beautiful rifles. IMO
 
Ok so you like either Rem 700s or Savages for Tactical . My Mod 70 classic in 270 WSM shoots great ! No its not a tactical rifle. I can most of the time get 1/2MOA at 100 yards with tailored hand loads.Is it because of some of the metal is below par? I can get that replaced. Mine has a Timney trigger and action has been bedded, laminated stock. So whats the problem?

I would never knock a 1/2 min., rifle I'd love to have a M70 that would shoot 1/2 min. I'd be married to many rifles that shoot 1/2 min. Enjoy that baby !
 
No reason. I have two F Class rifles built on M70 actions (one pf, and one crf). The M70 action is actually stiffer than a M700 action. What the M700 has going for it is it's symetrical design which is easier for gunsmiths to work on.

Don


If this were true, why do ALL the custom actions used in competition share basic design features of the Remington 700?
The proof lies in what's on top in the equipment lists on match reports.
 
Last edited:
If this were true, why do ALL the custom actions used in competition share basic design features of the Remington 700?
The proof lies in what's on top in the equipment lists on match reports.
  1. Don't believe equipment lists all the time - they can and do lie about what people are using. (Or rather, the people filling them out can and do lie about what they're using). Also, most highpower matches (F-Class included) don't generate equipment lists - too much work involved.
  2. The sheer number of Remington pattern receivers used may affect the outcome of any study.
  3. As repeatedly stated above, there are more tools and accessories available to work on Remington pattern actions. And more parts and accessories. If it requires more work and money to achieve the same result, which action would you choose?
 
Last edited:
ok OK OKAY!!!

Here's reason enough NOT to use the Model 70 Classic OR the pre-64 for a target rifle. (Aside from the fact that THEY WON'T SHOOT!)

In a word, casehead support.

PLEASE, for all of you'se who're deadset to reinvent the wheel DO NOT run high pressure loads in the Classic or pre-64 M70's! You either GET IT or you don't...... look inside if you DON'T but are mechanically inclined and you'll see why the rear of the case must necessarily hang out of the chamber further on the M70/Mauser style .

Know that MANY Extreme Accuracy shooters follow the Holy Grail of High Pressure. MANY believe that only by utilizing these high pressures can one realize the full benefit of a clean startup and burn. Those games which DO NOT require the same accuracy standard as BR are well served by the M70.

I also realize that this is "The Factory Forum" but it's STILL BRC! Here it's about ACCURACY..... And the M70's will not build to be as accurate, tooling aside.

Neither will the Rem 788

Nor a Ruger of any sort

Nor a Mauser/Tikka/Sako/Benelli/Thompson Center/Kimber/Blaser etc etc......

For pure intrinsic accuracy Rem/Sav rule....... Of all the people on this thread German Salazar is one who actually HAS SPENT THE MONEY on M70's. His stuff isn't speculative, it's REAL. And IF German steps up to say that the model 70 Win CAN BE MADE TO BE AS ACCURATE as a 700 or 110/112 then I will back down............ And ask German HOW to make them truly accurate! (BTW, I'll BETCHA' most of German's stuff is push feed! ;) )


Sorry for the passion, it's just that statements like "all things considered I think" and "people lie" and "I believe that if the same standards were applied"..... are SPECULATION! I'm trying to give good advice to the thousands who read this stuff. IMO it's a waste of good money to spend too much on the accuracy aspect of a Mauser styled rifle. There are reasons that things work, or don't.

wheewwwwww :eek:


al
 
I always figured it was just that the Rem 700 was more easily reworked into a better product than standard factory dims. Will the 70 produce 1/4min accuracy after all that work the 700's go through? Guess I'm not qualified to answer that one, but hopefully will be able to as I have a few FN manufactured actions on their way to my place and I intend to make them as accurate as possible. My goal is better than 1/2 MOA with a HUNTING rifle platform. Maybe by this summer I'll have a nice 6.5X47 Lapua or 260 Rem AI built up and can resurect this thread with some pics of the targets.

Still, would I build a benchrest gun on the 70, no, but then I wouldn't do it on a 700 either. For the extra work it takes, might as well start out with a custom.
 
msalm,

1/2moa HUNTING platform, YES. :) It's a fight but YES.

Let's also get another thing straight, as I've already stated, I LOVE M70 Classic and pre-64...... for hunting/carry rifles. My personal limits for this sort of thing are 350-400yds and 1/2moa is sufficient all things considered.


al
 
alinwa,
Now you got me....kind of a challenge...... Dammit, OK, I'm gonna shoot for half that, oh to be fair, let's say a .35 agg.... I don't even know if I can build a .2 agg gun but a friend has a 6mmBR I built for him on a Savage that is going mid .2's, and a 338 Edge on a nesika of mine is kinda scary, just wollers out the hole around the first shot with 300gr matchkings. I won't claim measurements on that as I didn't measure them, but I was very happy with it.
 
Last edited:
alinwa,
Now you got me....kind of a challenge...... Dammit, OK, I'm gonna shoot for half that, oh to be fair, let's say a .35 agg.... I don't even know if I can build a .2 agg gun but a friend has a 6mmBR I built for him on a Savage that is going mid .2's, and a 338 Edge on a nesika of mine is kinda scary, just wollers out the hole around the first shot with 300gr matchkings. I won't claim measurements on that as I didn't measure them, but I was very happy with it.

:):)


Love to see folks trying stuff for the CHALLENGE!!

See here's my story...... just ignore it if it's boring.

I went to gunsmithing school in the early 80's and worked in several stores as the 'smith. Thought I was perty good at making fac'try guns shoot good. By about 1985 or so I was of the opinion also that "the PPC/BR rounds aren't MAGIC!!! Who's to say that ANOTHER chambering wouldn't do just as good if it was built to BR Spec??" And ACTIONS??? "Shucks, they're all the same except for lock time and this doesn't matter off the steenking BAGS!! All's the action does is fire the round....it's the BARREL that does the work! I'd built rifles on Mausers, M70's even an 03-A3 Springfield that shot as good as Remingtons!"

By the late 80's I was making enough money to actually start finding out.

I did by this time decide to use the 700 action "because it's just as good as a custom." :) First I "accurized" some Remingtons and had them barreled in hotrod chamberings like 22-250 and .243AI, Shilen, Krieger, Hart etc....They shot "REALLY GOOD!" I figgered I was Golden..... These Rem's DID shoot better than the others........ some weird fliers, "BUT IF I DID MY PART they would've all been in the same hole!" IMO the Rem's were consistently better than the others, both mine and my friends', like M70's...


BUT, there were still fliers...... EVERYbody had fliers. Mine were "better" I thought, but not like the pictures in the match reports. Was it BAGS? or was it WIND?? or was it FLINCHING?? or what??? I burned powder by the pound trying load after load after load after.... I still couldn't get those rows of little groups.



I had plateau'd..... I had a Cooper in 22-250, a "6PPC USA" Sako and my Rem's and even a Ruger M77 and a fine looking #1 both in the "PPC USA" configuration. I had little groups on the wall, little groups in my wallet, little groups tacked to the fridge...... But invariably I couldn't reproduce them in front of witnesses :eek: I'd fall on my face EVERY time.

I didn't know why..... the guns SEEMED TO SHOOT!



So I had a real professional gun builder build me a rifle. I had Art Cocchia of Time Precision build me a "Test Platform"....... I got a 22BR barrel, a .243AI barrel, a 6BR barrel and just for kicks my first real 6PPC...... I had him fit a McMillan stock in HBR style with an added 3" wide forend plate. I was The Universal Dude... :D ... just screw in the appropriate barrel and Get 'Er Done. I got it home and started with the .243AI barrel since I really knew the characteristics of the round by now. And it was ground squirrel time...

It shot real good, better?? maybe than my others. I took it out varminting along with my 700 .243AI and they really knocked 'em down.


As Fall rolled around I figured, "What the Hey, I'll try this .22BR on for size. Maybe it'll be accurate enough to be fun. "It ain't no 22-250, but we'll see how she shoots...."




HOLY friggin' COW BATMAN!!!!!! I DIDN'T SUCK!!!


It was like the sun coming up! DOTS!!! Not all the time but DOTS!! All of a sudden I COULD SEE THE WIND! The 22BR and 6BR were just UNREAL! I could actually show off with them! This went on for almost a year before I decided to try the 6PPC.......... and believe it or not it was BETTER.


So I was desperate, everything pointed to me being WRONG! :eek:



I spent the next 8 yrs trying to prove my point:

I tried "identical barrels" but different chamberings, like 6BR and 6PPC and .243AI all same-same.

I've paid to have the SAME BARREL rechambered up to three times!

I've got two barrels from the same production run and taper, one in 6BR and the other in 6PPC....

I tried 6BR's in my Remingtons.... I tried different reamers and spec's.....5 6BR reamers and 5 .243AI reamers...... and wrote notes about my buddies' guns..... We swapped reamers etc trying out stuff.

I kept notebooks full of data and started throwing away my targets because they took up too much space.

I got more guns, custom actions. I learned WHY an action works and why it doesn't. I learned that a Rem 700 CAN BE MADE TO SHOOT but it took a whole lot more than "truing it up"......and it would always be slow. MOST actions will never really shoot "in the 2's" because they can't. The Savage Revolution started, BECAUSE it's built like a Remington, even has some "better" features..... but in the end, it's CHEAPER to just buy a custom action. Which is all getting away from the initial point.


And I could go on, but it's boring :) And I DO believe that with proper work you will probably get a 6BR down to .35" on a M70 action, 'specially a push-feeder..... but it's gonna' take some WORK! And you'll probably end up with a single shot. And it'll ONLY do this well with a 6BR or 22BR, and ONLY with light loads. You'll never explore the accuracy nodes over 3250fps in the 6BR...... but yes it'll shoot pretty good, just not like a 700! :) I've got a 700 with the fully functioning mag still in place that will shoot DOTS......It also cost almost a thousand bucks to set up.....


I guess what I'm saying is BRAVO! for trying. It will be an adventure.....I've spent tens of thousands of dollars to prove the Big Boys wrong. And found out that THEY WERE RIGHT! (It took me a long time to accept that DUHHH!, they've already been there and done that!)


LOL


al
 
I will swap even money ANY original pre-64 M70 you have for these prized 700's so you guys can have accurate target rifles:D:D:D
 
Back
Top