Weaver T36 vs Recoil

D

dwm

Guest
New guy question ....

Is there anything to worry about recoil wise with a Weaver T36 scope scope?


Thanks - doug
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What ya shoot'n.................. 50BMG.......?

Worried about POI issues...? Or Eye relief..? What type of gun and type of shooting you doin...?
If Benchrest... Or just like shooting small groups the 36 Weaver or Sightron will do ya well.
You'll be fine... Get one.

cale
 
If you are asking

New guy question ....

Is there anything to worry about recoil wise with a Weaver T36 scope scope?


Thanks - doug

about the Weaver T36's ability to hold POI over a long period of time, to benchrest demands for holding POI, every one I have owned have failed in time. When they are good they are good, but they don't last. Getting them fixed is a so so proposition. Every Leupold Comp scope I've had has had issues but Leup has been able, eventually, to fix them. I've since gone the Brackney frozen Leup Comp route. Good luck. --Greg
 
Doug

The Weaver T-36 features a erector tube that is mounted on the pivot end by a gimble joint, or as many say, a ball and socket joint. This female part of this joint is two piece, one part being in the body of the erector tube sleeve, and the other by a nut with a radius cut shoulder. The actual register surfaces of the joint are only about 1/16 inch wide.

These pices are very thin, made from aluminum. They have to be set up with zero clearance, but not so tight as to compromise the movement of the ball and socket joint.

The problem is that over a period of time, this joint will become compromised under recoil, the more recoil, probably the more compromised the joint will become. Keep in mind,we are talking about very small amounts of clearance, .001 would devestating to the accuracy of a Benchrest Rifle.

I have seen brand new Weavers out of the box that had a loose erector tube. I have also seen brand new ones where the person who asembled the unit forgot to tighten the joint properly and apply the locking compound.The locking compound is the only thing that keeps the nut from loosening.

But, I must say, the vast majority I ever took apart had nothing wrong at all.

The majority of the scopes manufactured in the far East share this similiar design. Shooters praise other brands, when in reality, they are all built pretty much the same. A gimble joint at one end, and springs holding the erector tube against the turret abutments on the other. In fact,the only scope that I have had apart that is different is the 36x Leupold. With it, the joint is formed by a shoulder machined into the scope body. The tension on this joint is held by a flat wave spring that is compressed by the nut that secures the reticle.

So, to answer your question, a Weaver T-36 will, in due time, suffer from the affects of recoil. How much?? I don't know. Granted, a 6PPC does not have that much, as compared to most Hunting Chamberings, but the number of firings is more.

Also,in 99 9 1/10 of the shooting public,this is of no consequence. But, in Benchrest, where the goal is sub .200 accuracy, it is one of the single biggest concerns that shooters have to be wary of.........jackie
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the info, I had seen several posts about this scope here and thought you guys would be best to ask about it.

So from what you are saying the the Weaver T36 will be similar to a Nikon, Burris, Bushnell, etc, with an adjustable objective, right? I thought about going with the Nikon Monarch or Bushnell Elite 4200 in 8x32 power but bought the Weaver T36 instead.

I plan to use it as a dedicated benchrest scope for doing load development on a couple of long range hunting rifles. Once I get a good, reliable load worked up the plan is to switch to a 6.5x20 MIL-DOT hunting scope.

Latest semi-custom rifle project is a 6.5WSM, 30 rounds down the tube and so far looking very promissing...
 
Back
Top