Taking unregistered alley sweepers and Saturday night specials and zip guns from the homes of underaged high risk kids is a good thing. I cannot find a downside here. I wouldn't want my wife to call the police about my 40X or my hunting rifles.
Concho Bill
The thing that scares me most sometimes is hearing this sort of rhetoric from committed and dedicated gun people!!!
WHAT EXACTLY does this mean Bill??
What's an "unregistered alley sweeper"? Or conversely what's a registered alley sweeper?
What's a "Saturday Night Special"??
What's a "Zip Gun"????? How many are out there?
I'm a gunsmith, I've built guns from the ground up. I've built set guns, trap guns, pen guns, buckle guns......... who builds zip guns? Where do the kids GET this sort of stuff?
In other words....... why the negative appellation? THIS IS MEDIA HYPE! This is the sort of verbiage that makes rules SOUND good. IMO these "underaged high risk kids" are just KIDS, just plain ol' kids like every body else except they're missing the stability of a cohesive family. They're sometimes threatened by the society around them and some of them do respond by acquiring guns....... GUNS, not "alley sweepers" or "zip guns". My belief is that solid and consistent application of existing law is what's needed, not some new invasion of privacy in the name of "security" and "doing whatever it takes".......
"doing whatever it takes"........... what BUNK!
IMO MOST of society mouths platitudes like "If It Saves ONE Life It's Worth It"....... "If it helps ONE child it's worth any cost"..........
This is pure liberal feel-good garbage.
In the real world everything is a matter of risk assessment and cost of human life. Actuary tables chart this for the insurance companies. In the real world the cost of insuring automobiles is driven by death and injury/dollar. Driving on our roads is more dangerous than being in the war in Iraq for crying out loud! "We did what it took to make everybody safe" is only a utopian CONCEPT, it's in no way an achievable reality........... The cost of building bridges, dams, office buildings, homes, cars, ANYthing factors in loss of life.
Gener'ly rules which are designed to "save lives" don't IME and creating another government funded program in the name of "making kids safer" is just a money pit.
Ok.... I'l stop now.
rant OFF
I'm probably breaking all the rules about "political topics" anyway..
Let's just say, I DO see a downside.
I better get outta' here and go talk about shooting.
LOL
al