al( and almost anyone else)
wouldn't the mil use the most effective brake design available ?( ok yes it is the mil)
but everything from 50bmg,tanks and a whole bunch of bigger things still use large opposing multi chamber ports to control recoil. high velocity, high gas volume high recoil...clam shell/port brakes.
I have a swirling pattern of small holes on a srewd brake on a 300 win mag.
how much of a small round hole is effective brake ? maybe 25% is mostly rear facing, 50% in not rear facing, and the other 25% is 45* or less.
wouldn't the mil use the most effective brake design available ?( ok yes it is the mil)
but everything from 50bmg,tanks and a whole bunch of bigger things still use large opposing multi chamber ports to control recoil. high velocity, high gas volume high recoil...clam shell/port brakes.
I have a swirling pattern of small holes on a srewd brake on a 300 win mag.
how much of a small round hole is effective brake ? maybe 25% is mostly rear facing, 50% in not rear facing, and the other 25% is 45* or less.