New to Benchrest/advice?

B

bluechip

Guest
Hello, I am a recently retired particle physicist whose curiousity has been piqued by the concept of accelerating a Cu clad Pb parabolic-semi boloid projectile with minimal deviation into a random dispersion of pressed celluloid fibers forming a rectangle sheet marked by various fractionaly refractive colored heavy petroleum distilates and organic pigments that mark the desired point of impact at a metered distance.
Using Bernoulli's energy equation, a powder accelerant should monesticly cause ablative hypergolic particles to form stoichmetric boundries with direct valance in high S value pericosities. As the Cu projectile enters the Fe based cylinder, a marked anodic scale annomaly such as galvanic amulite precipitates a diathetical evolute of retrograde temperature phase disposition, of course.
As the projectile exits the termination point of launch device, a De Laval nozzle would enhance manestically spaced inverse reactions, but only if specific impulse is within pyrolysis, of course. If this sounds a bit complex, this simple formula should clear matters somewhat.
 

Attachments

  • formula.gif
    formula.gif
    2.4 KB · Views: 376
Hello, I am a recently retired particle physicist whose curiousity has been piqued by the concept of accelerating a Cu clad Pb parabolic-semi boloid projectile with minimal deviation into a random dispersion of pressed celluloid fibers forming a rectangle sheet marked by various fractionaly refractive colored heavy petroleum distilates and organic pigments that mark the desired point of impact at a metered distance.
Using Bernoulli's energy equation, a powder accelerant should monesticly cause ablative hypergolic particles to form stoichmetric boundries with direct valance in high S value pericosities. As the Cu projectile enters the Fe based cylinder, a marked anodic scale annomaly such as galvanic amulite precipitates a diathetical evolute of retrograde temperature phase disposition, of course.
As the projectile exits the termination point of launch device, a De Laval nozzle would enhance manestically spaced inverse reactions, but only if specific impulse is within pyrolysis, of course. If this sounds a bit complex, this simple formula should clear matters somewhat.

You can do all that if you want, but I just wait till my flags look right and pull that trigger thing, works for me.
 
IMO a crude transposition if this oldie:



". . . Work has been proceeding in order to bring perfection to the crudely conceived idea of a machine that would not only supply inverse reactive current for use in unilateral phase detractors, but would also be capable of automatically synchronizing cardinal grammeters. Such a machine is the 'Turbo-Encabulator'. . . .

"The original machine had a base-plate of prefabulated amulite, surmounted by a malleable logarithmic casing in such a way that the two spurving bearings were in a direct line with the pentametric fan. . . . The main winding was of the normal lotus-o-delta type placed in panendermic semi-boloid slots in the stator, every seventh conductor being connected by a nonreversible trem'e pipe to the differential girdlespring on the 'up' end of the grammeters.

"Forty-one manestically spaced grouting brushes were arranged to feed into the rotor slipstream a mixture of high S-value phenylhydrobenzamine and 5% reminative tetryliodohexamine. Both of these liquids have specific pericosities given by P = 2.5C.n^6-7 where n is the diathetical evolute of retrograde temperature phase disposition and C is Cholmondeley's annular grillage coefficient. Initially, n was measured with the aid of a metapolar refractive pilfrometer . . . but up to the present date nothing has been found to equal the transcendental hopper dadoscope. . . .

"Undoubtedly, the turbo-encabulator has now reached a very high level of technical development. It has been successfully used for operating nofer trunnions. In addition, whenever a barescent skor motion is required, it may be employed in conjunction with a drawn reciprocating dingle arm to reduce sinusoidal depleneration."


For just a minute there I figgered dude was approaching the problem of copper deposition via gas management but upon further inspection I recognized it for what it was..... improvisational drivel. ;)


LOL

al
 
Darn

I wish Iwould have had this formula Sunday Afternoon at The Bluebonnet. Now it is all clear why I was locked into .500 inch of verticle at 200.........jackie
 
Busted!

Alinwa, look's like I got busted! Actually the recent turbo encabulator video gave me the idea to mess with you guys.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lVZ8Ko-nss4

Here's an good one. A wiki search of "encabulator" tells of a New York lawyer back in 1946 that worked with, possibly patents, for engineers and such. He was amused by the tech jargon that he kept hearing and put together his own 'encabulator' paper that has been around and only changed slightly over the years. It's pretty much the same as this video link.
 
New to Benchrest/advice?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hello, I am a recently retired particle physicist whose curiousity has been piqued by the concept of accelerating a Cu clad Pb parabolic-semi boloid projectile with minimal deviation into a random dispersion of pressed celluloid fibers forming a rectangle sheet marked by various fractionaly refractive colored heavy petroleum distilates and organic pigments that mark the desired point of impact at a metered distance.
Using Bernoulli's energy equation, a powder accelerant should monesticly cause ablative hypergolic particles to form stoichmetric boundries with direct valance in high S value pericosities. As the Cu projectile enters the Fe based cylinder, a marked anodic scale annomaly such as galvanic amulite precipitates a diathetical evolute of retrograde temperature phase disposition, of course.
As the projectile exits the termination point of launch device, a De Laval nozzle would enhance manestically spaced inverse reactions, but only if specific impulse is within pyrolysis, of course. If this sounds a bit complex, this simple formula should clear matters somewhat.



Yeah, what he said
 
Back
Top