JerrySharrett
Senile Member
Thanks for the "nitpicking" Jerry. In the future I will endeavor to explain what constitutes a stanrdard on their importance.
.....
I guess I could have worried about the chuck and collet before hand. But why? Indicating on the rod or mandrel told me everything needed. If the TIR had not been very close to TIR of my spindle THEN I would know that the the Collet Chuck and /or collet was suspect. AND THEN take corrective action.
I
Wallyw
Wally, nitpicking the integrity of the standard is not the point. The point is "stacking" measurements. Even if the standard is an example of perfection, how about the cyindricity of the collet bore, the circularity of the collet bore and cross sections of the cone, the concentricity of the collet bore to the concentricity of the collet cone??
Simply indicate the target surface that establishes where and how well all the collets in that set run.
Its a good video and I even ordered one of the collet chucks from that source just to see how well something that complicated could be made for $179 + shipping. I guess I am a stickler for following proper metrological procedures.
Note the third bullet point down under "Introduction".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metrology.