Some Ramblings
Hi Friends,
I swore I would leave this one alone, but here I am.
First let me say that many of you have made good points. The problem I have is one I liken to the city person who moves to the country because he thinks it would be a good place to raise kids and grow old in. Then before you know it he is trying to change things. Perhaps complaining that the streets are too narrow or the street lighting is poor. Perhaps even complaining that cow **** stinks. Then, if he gets his “improvements”, he complains that the taxes are too high. You know the kind?
As I said, most all have made good points, but some posters have a limited amount of time shooting RFBR. They do not have a firm grounding in the rules, customs and traditions of the games/disciplines. Most of the posters have never been a Match Director and most likely never will be one. Having a firm set of rules makes the match run smoothly and the Match Director’s job a bit easier…a job that is hard enough as it is. Remember, that Match Director most likely has a lot of experience under his belt.
Most rules are there for a reason. Do rules sometimes have to be bent a bit to fit the circumstance? Yes. For instance, if you have a gun that does not meet the criteria for a certain class you could ask the Match Director if you could shoot it anyway, for fun, knowing you would be DQ’ed. But you should ask first, not just bring it to the line. Speaking of asking, perhaps asking why a rule is there first might be a good idea. You may like the answer or you may not but at least you have a basis for further suggestions.
As to attracting new shooters? This has always been a problem and has been debated ad-infinitum on this board. Let’s face it; we have chosen a nitch sport that will probably never attract big numbers of shooters. Seems to me the best answer is what Joe Haller is doing. He has done a great job bringing in new shooters. Some of which I’m sure have “graduated” to IR or ARA or what ever.
Sorry for my babble. Just had to get my 2 cents in.
Al