S
ShelleyDavidson
Guest
I certainly don't want to get in an argument with any of my friends. BUT.... I do think it's important to understand how a tuner works so as to make informed decisions as to how to use them.
The engineers tell me that when you add weights behind the muzzle, you move the vibration node back down the barrel, toward the breech end. When you add weight in front of the muzzle you move the vibration node towards the muzzle and that's desirable.
Try this: take a barrel that's not mounted on a gun. Hold it at the breech end with one hand. Now, start whacking it with the side of a plastic ballpoint pen. It'll make a ringing sound at the muzzle but about 1.5" behind the muzzle the sound will be flat. This flat sound is what a vibration engineer calls a “node.” The node is at a transition area where vibration waves meet and there is very little vibration movement at that spot. Then as you continue to "ring the barrel" further towards the breech end, the barrel will ring again. If you cut the barrel at the node, the node will simply move back down the barrel and will still be about 1.5" behind the newly cut muzzle. But, if you attach a muzzle tuner, and some mass, in front of the muzzle you'll move the node nearer the muzzle. At this time, I believe that having this node near the muzzle will allow for a wider tune window. In other words, the rifle will stay in tune across a wider DA swing than if the node is further back down the barrel.
Having said all of this, both tuner designs will help in tuning the relationship of the time and place when the bullet exits the barrel. This was all demonstrated using Varmint Al's software but it was above most of our heads. (Including mine.)
You can get some real benefit by boring the end of a 1.250 straight taper live varmint barrel (or rail gun). Just bore the muzzle end out to .750 and have the depth at about 1.5". Or by attaching a bloop tube. Both will move the node forwards.
I am not an engineer, I'm just repeating what I learned by carefully listening to the guys who've done this for their living. And, if I've made any mistakes in the above statements, I'd sure appreciate hearing from the engineers.
Shelley
The engineers tell me that when you add weights behind the muzzle, you move the vibration node back down the barrel, toward the breech end. When you add weight in front of the muzzle you move the vibration node towards the muzzle and that's desirable.
Try this: take a barrel that's not mounted on a gun. Hold it at the breech end with one hand. Now, start whacking it with the side of a plastic ballpoint pen. It'll make a ringing sound at the muzzle but about 1.5" behind the muzzle the sound will be flat. This flat sound is what a vibration engineer calls a “node.” The node is at a transition area where vibration waves meet and there is very little vibration movement at that spot. Then as you continue to "ring the barrel" further towards the breech end, the barrel will ring again. If you cut the barrel at the node, the node will simply move back down the barrel and will still be about 1.5" behind the newly cut muzzle. But, if you attach a muzzle tuner, and some mass, in front of the muzzle you'll move the node nearer the muzzle. At this time, I believe that having this node near the muzzle will allow for a wider tune window. In other words, the rifle will stay in tune across a wider DA swing than if the node is further back down the barrel.
Having said all of this, both tuner designs will help in tuning the relationship of the time and place when the bullet exits the barrel. This was all demonstrated using Varmint Al's software but it was above most of our heads. (Including mine.)
You can get some real benefit by boring the end of a 1.250 straight taper live varmint barrel (or rail gun). Just bore the muzzle end out to .750 and have the depth at about 1.5". Or by attaching a bloop tube. Both will move the node forwards.
I am not an engineer, I'm just repeating what I learned by carefully listening to the guys who've done this for their living. And, if I've made any mistakes in the above statements, I'd sure appreciate hearing from the engineers.
Shelley
Last edited: