Everything I want to do, I have to do something else first.

F

frwillia

Guest
In an earlier thread I posted about the results of borescoping my Savage LRPV in .22-250 Rem/9" twist. My immediate goal is to recut the crown to get rid of the obvious burr, reassemble it, shoot it, and see what, if anything, that did to the group size. To do that, I wanted to to take the LRPV's barrel off the action.

To take the LRPV's barrel off the action, I needed to make "jaws" for the newely machined barrel vise bored to match the taper of the barrel. I didn't "really" need tapered jaws this time, but new barrels will have a shoulder, and nominally the same taper, so I figured to do this "right" the first time.

My 9" South Bend (a friend of 59 years) has a taper attachment, so the plan was to machine the vise insert in the South Bend. Besides, it is just plain fun to machine things on it. The South Bend had on it a new leather belt. I had glued it together twice, I inspected the joint, it looked good.

So I chucked and roughly trued the 1-1/2" piece of aluminum rod to drill and taper bore it. I was happily drilling away when just before I finished with the 1" silver and Demming bit (the plan is a tapered finish bore of 1.102 to 1.108") the spindle started to slow down. I glanced at the belt and saw the splice coming apart. I heard the drill finish the cut and shut the lathe down, but the belt was well and truly no longer a functional loop.

By the time I got it re-scarfed, it was too short. This was the third break at that joint so I wasn't regarding that belt as my friend. I went to the Practical Machinist SB forum, read all the good stuff about using serpentine belts, decided I'd do that. Tradition is fine but having something that works is even better. Even more important, I could get a serpentine belt like immediately. A leather belt was going to be order and wait at best.

Now, I'be been told I should be more patient. My stock reply is I have lots of patience. I have all the patience I was born with, I haven't used any yet. And I really wanted to get on with the vise jaw inserts.

I had a bit of an attitude about glued splices so I decided to lace the belt together with fishline. I consulted with my good friend in MN who is an ardent fisherman, he suggested Spectra fishing line with the caveat that I'd have to knot it, nothing much would stick to it.

I found a good clerk at the local autoparts store. It took him a while to realize I couldn't give him a make and model of car, but once that was established he took the tape measure and my dimensions, went to the back, and in a few minutes emerged holding a 56" long 6 rib belt just over 3/4" wide. It was $18.00 out the door in round numbers. I still needed to buy fishing line to lace it together.

I needed a box of subsonic .22 rimfire ammo for the Single Six to deal with feral cats at the barn, so I went to Gander and picked up some 65-lb test Spectra line. There are 20 threads of it holding the belt together - trust me on this, I could pick up the lathe and table with that belt.

I cut the belt to length using a 1" sharp as a razor wood chisel aligned using a machinist's square and a whack from my wooden chisel mallet. Worked great. Nice clean square cut. And it was about instantaneous. That I managed to avoid sacrifices involving blood loss in the process was a feature.

I drilled lacing holes in the belt about a 1/4" from the ends, made a jig to hold it in position with it around the lathe pulleys, and laced it up. It took about half an hour and a bit of a patience expenditure to figure out how to tie the thread using only two hands and teeth, but I got it done with out any bad words.

I took a light clean up cut at constant diameter, then engaged the taper attachment and turned taper in bore of barrel vise jaw insert, tried on barrel, they fit on the first try! Dang but I'm good. Oh, Ok, ok, awriteawreddy, so I'm lucky, now and then. I'll take it. Lucky is good. I remembered to label the large diameter end in two places before going any farther.

I clamped them in the mill vise, cut them apart on one side with 3/8" end mill and some kerosene, turned them over, cut them apart on the other side. Deburred the edges. The vise has a 3/8" gap because that is what was avilable to space them when they were bored to 1-1/2".

Bolted the barrel vise to the mill table, the mill weighs about 2,200 lbs, didn't figure I'd be able to turn it over, and I didn't. I slipped the Wheeler barrel nut wrench over the barrel nut, then slid the barrel and inserts into the vise, and torqued the vise bolts to gootentite.

I oriented the barrel nut wrench so I could tap it with the dead blow hammer, gave it about 4 moderate taps and the nut was loose. The barrel didn't shift at all in the vise but that wasn't much of a test.

I unscrewed the action, took off the recoil lug, unscrewed the barrel nut, and decided it was OK to check off step 1 of recrowning the barrel.

I like the Wheeler barrel nut wrench. I like the fact that one can use it to torque the barrel nut to 40 ft-lbs with a 1/2" drive torque wrench if that was desired - although some arithmetic is required if one is fussy about the accuracy - it has to be treated like a crow foot wrench. I like torque specifications.

I probably didn't have to take the action off, but I didn't want it spinning around out there where it might get damaged while I was fixing the crown. The action is worth more than the barrel.

While the action is off I'm going to polish the chamber lightly with some 1200 paper to see if I can reduce the tendancy of the brass to thin right above the base to side wall transition. I ordered a Go-Gage for reinstalling the receiver.

I measured the recoil lug on the surface plate, and between the jaws of a 1" micrometer. It is .2505" everyplace. Parallel sides, nice finish. No new lug needed, this one is just fine. I love it when that happens.

I looked at the recoil lugs, I'll take a picture of them so you can look at them too .... back in a few ... OK, got some pictures. This is what they look like, lower lug first, upper lug second:

LowerLuginFocus-RS.jpg


UpperLuginfocus-RS.jpg


I'm not real pleased with the lugs, but the rifle has fired groups in the teens with them looking like this. Counting these, I've looked at exactly 1 set of recoil lugs. Not much of an experience base. Ok, no experience base at all. I'm not going to do anything to them immediately. But I'd appreciate it if anybody could tell me if these are candidates for machining based on appearance.

The next step will be to recrown the barrel, reassemble the rifle, and see how it shoots with just that one change. One thing at a time. Seperation of variables purity will be compromised by having removed and replaced the receiver, but that shouldn't have much effect on group size.

The Go-Gage has shipped from Midway. PTG they said they would ship the #1 Grizzly rod with nominal .22 Center Fire and 6mm bushings last Friday.

I'm pretty pumped about getting this far.

Fitch
 
You could have a problem with sticky brass with a polished chamber. I believe that Dave Tooley got me on the used 320paper. Just polish a small crosshatch.
Butch
 
You could have a problem with sticky brass with a polished chamber. I believe that Dave Tooley got me on the used 320paper. Just polish a small crosshatch.
Butch

I understand why that is done in an engine cyclinder, but I'm not convinced it is best for a chamber. So at the risk of giving some here a headache, lets discuss it for a round or two.

The reasoning behind my going for as smooth as I can get is this:

What is happening now is that the brass thins to the point of unusability inside just above where the base tapers into the sidewall in 6 or 7 firings. My theory is that the chamber is rough enough that the brass is sticking to it along the case walls so the base is pushing back to the bolt and stretching it with nearly all the stretch taking place in a very short length of sidewall just above where the base taper ends.

My plan to fix that was to make the chamber smooth enough that the stretch would be spread along the length of the case from shoulder to base instead of being concentrated in that one spot.

I read the finite element analysis article on Varmint Al's web page during my search for a solution. His analysis, shown here: http://www.varmintal.net/a243z.htm made a lot of sense to me. I'm used to reading analysis like that, used to see it all the time, and I am confident that while absolute numbers might vary a bit, his conclusion is right on the money.

He had a follow up article where he ran some friction tests to back up the finite element analysis. That article is here: http://www.varmintal.net/afric.htm

He ended up concluding it was about impossible, in any practical sense, to make a chamber too smooth, which is why I was going to go with the finest grit I could find. I might need to start with something more like 600 and then go finer. I do not want to enlarge it, just make it smoother.

What's the physics behind the case sticking if it is too smooth? At the moment I can't figure out why that would be.

Fitch
 
Fitch, push your clean dry finger across a piece of clean glass. Yes, I have read all that you are speaking of and I will continue doing it my way. What I do works for me and I think you need to go with what you believe in.
Butch
 
yet. And I really wanted to get on with the vise jaw inserts.

I had a bit of an attitude about glued splices so I decided to lace the belt together with fishline. I consulted with my good friend in MN who is an ardent fisherman, he suggested Spectra fishing line with the caveat that I'd have to knot it, nothing much would stick to it.

II cut the belt to length using a 1" sharp as a razor wood chisel aligned using a machinist's square and a whack from my wooden chisel mallet. Worked great. Nice clean square cut. And it was about instantaneous. That I managed to avoid sacrifices involving blood loss in the process was a feature.

I drilled lacing holes in the belt about a 1/4" from the ends, made a jig to hold it in position with it around the lathe pulleys, and laced it up. It took about half an hour and a bit of a patience expenditure to figure out how to tie the thread using only two hands and teeth, but I got it done with out any bad words.




I measured the recoil lug on the surface plate, and between the jaws of a 1" micrometer. It is .2505" everyplace. Parallel sides, nice finish. No new lug needed, this one is just fine. I love it when that happens.

I looked at the recoil lugs, I'll take a picture of them so you can look at them too .... back in a few ... OK, got some pictures. This is what they look like, lower lug first, upper lug second:


I'm not real pleased with the lugs, but the rifle has fired groups in the teens with them looking like this. Counting these, I've looked at exactly 1 set of recoil lugs. Not much of an experience base. Ok, no experience base at all. I'm not going to do anything to them immediately. But I'd appreciate it if anybody could tell me if these are candidates for machining based on appearance.


The Go-Gage has shipped from Midway. PTG they said they would ship the #1 Grizzly rod with nominal .22 Center Fire and 6mm bushings last Friday.

I'm pretty pumped about getting this far.

Fitch
There usually is a guy on eBay who sells newly made belts for SBL's. I've used them, they are the cross-pin type. http://cgi.ebay.com/South-Bend-or-A...5|66:2|65:12|39:1|240:1318|301:1|293:1|294:50

As to the lugs, they look like they both contact!!!
 
Fitch

I assume you are talking about the case thickness thinning just in front of the extractor groove. It sounds like you might have a headspace problem, by that, I mean you are sizing your brass to where the shoulder bump is excessive, allowing the case walls to adhere to the chamber, but letting the case head slam against the bolt face by stretching the metal. How are you checking how much "bump" you are giving the shoulder??

As for the chamber. keep in mind, thousands of shooters use that very same chamber with zero problems.

I do not know how Savage cuts chambers, or if it is hammer forged into the barrel. Regardless, I have found that the finish that the reamer leaves is the best all around for allowing the case to adhere momentarilly to the chamber walls, then collapse, for easy extraction. A chamber that is too slick can result in the case not gripping the chamber walls and allow the case to slam against the bolt face, resulting in a tight bolt lift, even with moderate loads.

As for the locking lugg abutments, remember, the bolt has already established a good wear pattern, that little bit of gall on the top one should be of no consequence if the bolt functions properly. This is one of those times when the "fix" might do more damage than what the "problem" causes.

As for your South Bend Lathe, we had one of those years ago. We used an actual lacing tool to do the belt. The lathe is no longer in use. I did scavange the compound to use as the windage top on my front rest........jackie
 
Last edited:
There usually is a guy on eBay who sells newly made belts for SBL's. I've used them, they are the cross-pin type.

Thanks for the suggestion. I'm assuming those would be the ones with the metal clips and cross pin. I know they work but I didn't want to listen to them. The flat rubber one I have now laced with fishing line is working really well at the moment, and it's as quiet as the new leather one was.

As to the lugs, they look like they both contact!!!

They do. Good point! I think that answers the question. I'll leave them alone.

Thanks
Fitch
 
I assume you are talking about the case thickness thinning just in front of the extractor groove. It sounds like you might have a headspace problem, by that, I mean you are sizing your brass to where the shoulder bump is excessive, allowing the case walls to adhere to the chamber, but letting the case head slam against the bolt face by stretching the metal. How are you checking how much "bump" you are giving the shoulder??

Good question. I posted on here about that but can't find it right now. I measured a fired case using a tool that fastens to one jaw of my calipers. It has a hollow piece that fits over the neck and contacts the shoulder.

The data I got suggested the resized brass was longer than the fired brass which I found confusing and counterintuitive. I could see sizing marks on the case OD near the shoulder and about 2/3'ds of the way down, so it was reduced in diameter, and fit right in the chamber, but it measured longer using the tool.

It occurred to me, and some others on here, that the neck expander was pulling the neck up which might be giving me a false reading. The instrument doesn't read right at the OD of the shoulder, it reads at a place between there and the neck.

As for the chamber. keep in mind, thousands of shooters use that very same chamber with zero problems.

I do not know how Savage cuts chambers, or if it is hammer forged into the barrel. Regardless, I have found that the finish that the reamer leaves is the best all around for allowing the case to adhere momentarilly to the chamber walls, then collapse, for easy extraction. A chamber that is too slick can result in the case not gripping the chamber walls and allow the case to slam against the bolt face, resulting in a tight bolt lift, even with moderate loads.

As for the locking lugg abutments, remember, the bolt has already established a good wear pattern, that little bit of gall on the top one should be of no consequence if the bolt functions properly. This is one of those times when the "fix" might do more damage than what the "problem" causes.

I agree. I might lap it a bit with some laping compound to smooth the surface and forstall more gaulling, but I won't try machining it.

As for your South Bend Lathe, we had one of those years ago. We used an actual lacing tool to do the belt. The lathe is no longer in use. I did scavange the compound to use as the windage top on my front rest........jackie

That's a cool idea. That would make a solid front rest!

This one I have has been in the family since my Dad bought it new. I helped clean the cosmoline off it and was in the shop, "helping" Dad, as much as a 7 year old can, while he built the lathe bench. I was allowed to use it with some supervision when I was 8. With out when i was 10. Been using that same lathe off and on since. I'll be 67 in April. I made it a taller metal bench when I moved it to Califronia in '98. I still have the original bench with it's top made of on edge 2x4's bolted together with 1/2" steel rods that Dad threaded with a tap while I watched. My Dad and I spent hours together in the shop.

The paint shows it's age but the ways are darn near perfect as are the bearings. I have about every attachment for it known to man and some I've made - like the MLA T-slotted cross slide. I use it whenever I get the chance - which means everytime the job will fit it in.

My other lathe, the one that has the barrel in question in it through the headstock, is a 12x36 gear head import. I've had it for nearly 20 ... no, as of December it's 21 years (my gosh but time flies!). It's always gotten the job done for me, and with the 1.63" spindle bore it has plenty of room for a barrel and with the spider chuck will do barrels as short as 19". I'm hoping to chamber lots of barrels in it, then wear them out at the range and shooting lots of ground hogs and coyotes.

They are what I have. They are paid for. They are in excellent condition. I'm gonna use 'em till I can't turn the cranks anymore. I'd love to wear them out, I'm going to try! :D

Fitch
 
Last edited by a moderator:
My other lathe, the one that has the barrel in question in it through the headstock, is a 12x36 gear head import. I've had it for nearly 20 ... no, as of December it's 21 years (my gosh but time flies!). It's always gotten the job done for me, and with the 1.63" spindle bore it has plenty of room for a barrel and with the spider chuck will do barrels as short as 19". I'm hoping to chamber lots of barrels in it, then wear them out at the range and shooting lots of ground hogs and coyotes.

They are what I have. They are paid for. They are in excellent condition. I'm gonna use 'em till I can't turn the cranks anymore. I'd love to wear them out, I'm going to try! :D

Fitch
Fitch, slow down, slow down. The first trouble with retirement is getting time to do all the fun stuff you have looked forward to for the last 10 years. But don't try to do all them in the first year.

I'm dealing right now with a friend who just retired at age 72. He has paid up his office lease for another year and still goes in every day.

Some critical things to be aware of in retirement. As a retiree you have no more weekends off and no more vacation to schedule.

I may go into the Retirement Consultant business.
 
Fitch, slow down, slow down. The first trouble with retirement is getting time to do all the fun stuff you have looked forward to for the last 10 years. But don't try to do all them in the first year.

I'm dealing right now with a friend who just retired at age 72. He has paid up his office lease for another year and still goes in every day.

Some critical things to be aware of in retirement. As a retiree you have no more weekends off and no more vacation to schedule.

I may go into the Retirement Consultant business.

<LOL>

I have two rules for retirement:

  1. Having fun is job 1.
  2. Nothing is urgent.

I retired in June of 2004. I'm getting better at time off!


Fitch
 
I assume you are talking about the case thickness thinning just in front of the extractor groove. It sounds like you might have a headspace problem, by that, I mean you are sizing your brass to where the shoulder bump is excessive, allowing the case walls to adhere to the chamber, but letting the case head slam against the bolt face by stretching the metal. How are you checking how much "bump" you are giving the shoulder??

Jerry,

The go-gage arrived today. I have the barrel in the headstock with the receiver off it. It occurred to me that I might have a way to answer your question, how much am I bumping the shoulder?

I stuck the go-gage in the barrel, it sticks out 0.128" measured with a depth mic. When I stick in a piece of spent, deprimed, but unsized, brass, it sticks out 0.129". If I put in a piece of sized unprimed brass, it sticks out 0.127". So if I'm understanding this correctly:

  1. I'm bumping the shoulder about 0.002" when I full length resize?
  2. The rifle was chambered from the factory with about 0.001" over minimum headspace?

Thanks
Fitch
 
Back
Top