T
Twud
Guest
How is the datum line established? Just half way down the shoulder?
Mostly curiosity, but I have a new 6BR with a sticky bolt even with new unfired Lapua brass. With fired brass it's much worse. I ordered a head space guage as I think the cases might need to have the shoulders set back. Wouldn't a head space guage measure off the datum line?
It's a BAT action.
Another interesting thing, I use TM grease on the lugs. If I fire one round and pull the bolt all the grease has been wiped away, I assume by the the other lug. I've never seen this in any factory rifle I've ever owned.
Your help is appreciated.
A sticky bolt on unfired brass... sounds like it is not chambered for Lapua brass which is slightly larger at the rear of the case...
If the headspace is a little tight, the bolt will be hard to close but it will not be sticky on extraction... it is when the rear of the case is tight in the chamber, you will get the sticky bolt opening as it is hard to extract that thick jammed in brass...
A sticky bolt on unfired brass... sounds like it is not chambered for Lapua brass which is slightly larger at the rear of the case...
If the headspace is a little tight, the bolt will be hard to close but it will not be sticky on extraction... it is when the rear of the case is tight in the chamber, you will get the sticky bolt opening as it is hard to extract that thick jammed in brass...
He used a reamer sized for the Lapua brass. He built a gun for himself right after mine using the same reamer. He shoots 34.5 gr. of Varget with his 68 gr. bullets without a hitch. I'm shoting the same bullet with 31 gr. of Varget and I'm getting a sticky bolt.
I'm kinda' confused. Keeping spring back in consideration, don't we want a die that is smaller in the base than the fired rounds? Our builder friend dosen't want to seem to take this seriously. Should I say screw it and just shoot the gun this way?
I'm still waiting for my head space guage to show up as I want to rule out any head space issues.
I'm kinda' confused. Keeping spring back in consideration, don't we want a die that is smaller in the base than the fired rounds? Our builder friend dosen't want to seem to take this seriously. Should I say screw it and just shoot the gun this way?
I'm still waiting for my head space guage to show up as I want to rule out any head space issues.
Got it. I'm not going to do anything until this shoulder guage shows up.Twud,
Everything you just said is true. What I perceived to be the problem is the case was not allowed to go far enough up into the die when re-sizing. When I first ran into the problem with my .22-250 A.I., I was resizing with a Redding body die cammed into the shell holder. The re-sized brass was still stiff to chamber but just a little better with a harder cam-over. That told me the case needed to go into the die a little more to properly squeeze the base and bump the shoulder. I had the firing pin removed from the bolt when I was working this problem out and was checking my headspace change constantly after every sizing . I took a skim cut of .005 from the base and used .004 of die shims, repeating the process and checking with headspace gauges. With around .003 of die shims under the die, my die bumped the shoulder back .001, squeezed the base and the brass chambered beautifully. I've done the same procedure with all of my Redding body dies, for chambers cut by our buddy, and have never had a problem since. See if that makes sense to you.
What I learned from the above and suspect, is that our buddy's reamers are tighter than others, as he orders to his specs. I believe that is why he favors using Henricksen reamers. As I explained, he takes a little patience to get to know but once you figure him out, he's a very cagey and experienced man who has adapted his own proprietary techniques that aren't readily shared. When I ran this scenario by him several years ago; explaining my hunches, he just smiled. Since that day, we've been very good friends.
Lou Baccino
Chino69