M
michaelnel
Guest
Hello All
I am thinking about converting from my current method of reloading 6mm BR (using an RCBS Rock Chucker Supreme press with Redding Competition type S bushing neck sizing dies) and switching over the the Wilson / Sinclair / Hand dies and arbor press method.
I think I understand the advantages of the hand die method (better concentricity being the most important), but I am wondering about some of the specifics of the tools.
First, I see Wilson only offers neck resizing using their neck/decapping die. Is this what most long range benchrest shooters do, neck sizing only with an occasional shoulder bump with a body die?
Bullet seaters from Wilson and Sinclair range from around $57 up to about $200. Looks like there is a plain one, a stainless micrometer one, and the Sinclair/Wilson one that is stainless, micrometer, and with 0.0005" clicks. You folks feel it is worth the extra dough for the top of the line one?
Arbor presses. So far I have found the Sinclair one (gets lots of bad reviews for gear tooth breakage but good reviews for Sinclair's replacement policy, although my experience with Sinclair and Brownells is that yes, they will replace the stuff, and unfortunately it takes weeks to make the round trip).
There is the Bald Eagle one (but I'm sure it must be either Chinese or Taiwanese with the corner cutting that always comes along with manufacturing there), so I am hesitant to go with that one.
I have a couple items from 21st Century shooting that I have been very impressed with (primer seater and expander mandrel die). They make a couple different kinds, a conventional gear driven one kind of like the Sinclair and Bald Eagle ones and a new generation one that uses linkage instead of the rack and pinion setup. Is that mostly an advantage if you want to do full length resizing?
Last one I have found is the K&M, which also looks like a premium tool and an innovative design, with the toggle-link system.
There isn't a heck of a lot of money spread between them all. I am tending to lean toward the K&M as what looks like the best design, and the ability to add more farkles to it in the future (force measurement).
So what are the opinions of the learned folks here?
I am thinking about converting from my current method of reloading 6mm BR (using an RCBS Rock Chucker Supreme press with Redding Competition type S bushing neck sizing dies) and switching over the the Wilson / Sinclair / Hand dies and arbor press method.
I think I understand the advantages of the hand die method (better concentricity being the most important), but I am wondering about some of the specifics of the tools.
First, I see Wilson only offers neck resizing using their neck/decapping die. Is this what most long range benchrest shooters do, neck sizing only with an occasional shoulder bump with a body die?
Bullet seaters from Wilson and Sinclair range from around $57 up to about $200. Looks like there is a plain one, a stainless micrometer one, and the Sinclair/Wilson one that is stainless, micrometer, and with 0.0005" clicks. You folks feel it is worth the extra dough for the top of the line one?
Arbor presses. So far I have found the Sinclair one (gets lots of bad reviews for gear tooth breakage but good reviews for Sinclair's replacement policy, although my experience with Sinclair and Brownells is that yes, they will replace the stuff, and unfortunately it takes weeks to make the round trip).
There is the Bald Eagle one (but I'm sure it must be either Chinese or Taiwanese with the corner cutting that always comes along with manufacturing there), so I am hesitant to go with that one.
I have a couple items from 21st Century shooting that I have been very impressed with (primer seater and expander mandrel die). They make a couple different kinds, a conventional gear driven one kind of like the Sinclair and Bald Eagle ones and a new generation one that uses linkage instead of the rack and pinion setup. Is that mostly an advantage if you want to do full length resizing?
Last one I have found is the K&M, which also looks like a premium tool and an innovative design, with the toggle-link system.
There isn't a heck of a lot of money spread between them all. I am tending to lean toward the K&M as what looks like the best design, and the ability to add more farkles to it in the future (force measurement).
So what are the opinions of the learned folks here?