P
Paul Skvorc
Guest
That seems reasonable me, jackie schmidt.
I just got off the phone with "Dave" at Brownell's, and somebody (I forget his name) at Turnbull's. "Dave" was helpful, and quickly recommended the articles in "Double Gun" referenced above. In fact, he said he thought those writings were the best that has ever been written on the subject. He felt, based on his personal experience that the Turk '38 receiver was a particularly good choice for case coloring. His first comment, repeated at the end of the conversation for emphasis, was: "There's a lot of snake-oil out there about case coloring." I'm sure he's quite right.
The fellow at Turnbull's was a bit "cagier" in his responses. At first, he stated that Turnbull case colored "No" bolt action receivers. Later he acknowledged that Turnbull does case coloring for a "few" manufacturers, citing Dakota and Neska in example. Finally, he 'hinted' that the Turk receiver was "a good candidate" for case coloring. That pretty much eliminates Turnbull as a viable alternative to doing it myself.
Neither of the fellows expressed any concern over the safety of the action after case coloring/hardening. The only comment made (by "Dave") was that if a receiver wasn't annealed first, the "coloring" would constitute a "double hardening". He didn't say he thought that was necessarily "bad", just that it would make further machining "almost impossible".
I also called the fellow that owns the Color Case Company in New Springfield, Ohio. I understand he is no longer in business, but I thought he might be able to offer some advice. Unfortunately, I wasn't able to raise him by phone.
"Dave" noted that the few people in the country that are doing case coloring as a business are quite tight-lipped about their processes.
And there-in 'lies the rub'.
It's a bit too 'convenient' to me that the achemists, out of one side of their mouths spread "gloom and doom" if the uninitiated even think about trying to do what the 'priests' do "behind closed doors". At the same time, out of the other side of their mouths, they refuse to reveal any of their "trade secrets". One or the other of those positions is at least slightly defensible. Together, it's nothing more than greed and selfishness. Throughout my life I have found that the more the priests and alchemists wish to keep something secret - thereby maintaining their 'priesthood' - the more I am motivated to learn the "magic" myself and reveal the "man behind the curtain". My experience has been that there's a darn-sight less "magic" than the 'masses' are lead to believe, and that true experts, (of which there are precious few), aren't threatened by passing their knowledge on.
Looks to me like the best course is to 'dive right in'.
You can be sure that I won't be hiding anything I find or figure out... I have no interest in "the priesthood".
Paul
I just got off the phone with "Dave" at Brownell's, and somebody (I forget his name) at Turnbull's. "Dave" was helpful, and quickly recommended the articles in "Double Gun" referenced above. In fact, he said he thought those writings were the best that has ever been written on the subject. He felt, based on his personal experience that the Turk '38 receiver was a particularly good choice for case coloring. His first comment, repeated at the end of the conversation for emphasis, was: "There's a lot of snake-oil out there about case coloring." I'm sure he's quite right.
The fellow at Turnbull's was a bit "cagier" in his responses. At first, he stated that Turnbull case colored "No" bolt action receivers. Later he acknowledged that Turnbull does case coloring for a "few" manufacturers, citing Dakota and Neska in example. Finally, he 'hinted' that the Turk receiver was "a good candidate" for case coloring. That pretty much eliminates Turnbull as a viable alternative to doing it myself.
Neither of the fellows expressed any concern over the safety of the action after case coloring/hardening. The only comment made (by "Dave") was that if a receiver wasn't annealed first, the "coloring" would constitute a "double hardening". He didn't say he thought that was necessarily "bad", just that it would make further machining "almost impossible".
I also called the fellow that owns the Color Case Company in New Springfield, Ohio. I understand he is no longer in business, but I thought he might be able to offer some advice. Unfortunately, I wasn't able to raise him by phone.
"Dave" noted that the few people in the country that are doing case coloring as a business are quite tight-lipped about their processes.
And there-in 'lies the rub'.
It's a bit too 'convenient' to me that the achemists, out of one side of their mouths spread "gloom and doom" if the uninitiated even think about trying to do what the 'priests' do "behind closed doors". At the same time, out of the other side of their mouths, they refuse to reveal any of their "trade secrets". One or the other of those positions is at least slightly defensible. Together, it's nothing more than greed and selfishness. Throughout my life I have found that the more the priests and alchemists wish to keep something secret - thereby maintaining their 'priesthood' - the more I am motivated to learn the "magic" myself and reveal the "man behind the curtain". My experience has been that there's a darn-sight less "magic" than the 'masses' are lead to believe, and that true experts, (of which there are precious few), aren't threatened by passing their knowledge on.
Looks to me like the best course is to 'dive right in'.
You can be sure that I won't be hiding anything I find or figure out... I have no interest in "the priesthood".
Paul