Al, I'm trying to get a handle on this "seasoning" brass concept. Now, don't get me wrong. I'll take your testing as a good answer. But it is a whole lot better if it fits into a model, a predictive model, because we've learned time and time again that one man's test includes a bunch of things unmentioned. Sometimes those turn out to be important. The conclusions of the test weren't wrong, but repeating them by someone else may not work quite right.
OK a true story.
Back in the late 1990s, a 1,000 yard shooter named Joe Cain wanted to honor Newton, so he chambered up a barrel in .30 Newton. His original cases were made from the 8x68 brass. At the time, RWS was the only good manufacturer of the 8x68, and RWS components were available in the States only through The Old Western Scrounger. Availability was variable, and price was high.
So Joe got some .300 Win Mag brass and fireformed it in his .30 Newton chamber. He not only lived, but the rifle shot quite well.
OK, dimensions (All dimensions from Howell's Designing and Forming Custom Cartridges):
The 8x68 case is beltless, and has a diameter at the head of .5236.
.300 Win Mag has a belt of .5320, and the case measures .5130 just ahead of the belt.
I don't know if Joe turned the belt .008 to fit his chamber or not. But the brass at the head, just after the belt, had to expand .019 -.020 to fill the chamber. It did, and it worked.
After the mandatory Don't try this at home statement, what do you think?
Not as important, but aside from the theory, I got two notions. (1) If absolutely safe this would be a nice way to get rid of the belt. After buying the appropriate reamer, I know guys who turn the belts off in a lathe. Much less work to start with a different reamer and just blow out the case. IF SAFE, of course
And (2)? Oh. I shoot a .30 S.O.B., also on a 8x68 case. RWS brass is still expensive and hard to get. .300 Win Mag isn't.
And maybe (3), I'm about to order a reamer. The case has a head diameter of .498, a bit bigger than your usual toys. Would you recommend a reamer of .004 over the virgin diameter at .020 up from the boltface? Or do you predict that the larger the diameter, the more clearance desired? Again, this will be that hard RWS brass. (Yes, I know, I'm being inconsistent. But I already got over 200 pieces for this new toy, which should see me through to the end of my days. I'm already out of 8x68 brass.)