The .300 WSM is a popular chambering in 1,000 yard (Benchrest) Heavy Guns. Heavy Guns have no weight limit. Most weigh in the 65-100 pound region. Mine weighs 75 pounds. It is useless for short range (100-300 yard) benchrest.
I'd like to make a point. There is a lot of difference between the claim of "benchrest standards" and actual "benchrest shooting." & by the way, if there are no matches in your area (Warner or Marble mountains?), what's this rifle for?
Here is a link that gives the results of a short-range group match:
http://internationalbenchrest.com/results/group/2012/Union County/Nationals/GroupNationals.php
Just look at the first data column, the grand agg for the 2-gun. There were 100 rounds fired for this, 50 at 100 yards, 50 at 200 yards.
(BTW, The difference between a Light Varmint & a Heavy Varmint rifle is kind of irrelevant today. I'll bet over half the competitors used the same rifle for both. A second note: to average groups fired at two distances, the inch-measurements were converted to minutes of angle -- essentially the same as inches at 100 yards.)
Notice the guy in first place shot .2111, The guy in 10th shot .2435. In other words, after 100 rounds, and 10 places separating them, the groups got .0324 larger. Last time I looked, that's about 1/32 of an inch.
What's the point of that kind of precision? You tell me. But
that is benchrest.
Long range, 1,000 yard benchrest, doesn't give such dramatic results. But it isn't because of the rifles, it is because of the distance, what happens in the air between muzzle and a half a mile down the road. I have a .338 that, when in tune, will fire 5-shot groups at 100 yards that measure .100. Of course the rifle weighs 17 pounds and has a muzzle brake, neither of which is allowed in short-range benchrest. If you ask why they're not allowed, you've missed the point. Don't know anybody, not even the special ops groups that favor physical strength & conditioning, that can sit there and shoot .100 groups when it is 100 rounds, every shot counts, can't throw any shots out, no alibis, with an unbraked 10.5 pound rifle chambered in .338. Or .300 WSM, for that matter.
Now a 6mm BR? Yeah, maybe. You give up a little to the rifles chambered to the smaller PPC at short range, you might give up a little to bigger rounds when the wind's up at long range. But might not, at long range. The 6mm Dasher's been doing a lot of winning, including the IBS 1000 Yard Shooter of the Year for 2012. Who was a girl, by the way. (Usually the women can outshoot the men. They don't have to get rid of the nonsense that they are genetically equipped to shoot like so many guys do.)
So, all the guys here that are asking you "what's this rifle for" are really asking a most important question, if any of our experience is to be applied.
By the way, on gunsmithing. Any good gunsmith checks his work when the chamber is finished. Basically, that is the total indicated runout of the chamber, as measured with a .0001 dial indicator. This is a relative measurement, we all know you can't measure
to .0001 outside a controlled environment.
The set up is to measure runout, at least at the freebore in the throat, and best to measure the difference between that and the tops of the lands after the end of the forcing cone, if your stylus is long enough. You get the idea. How close to the bore centerline is the bullet as it lies in the case?
That number should be real close to .0002. Two ten-thousandths.
You can claim "benchrest quality" only if 99 percent of your chambers measure this. You've already rejected the barrel as unsuitable if you can't find a spot to cut the chamber where this two ten-thousandths can be achieved.
Now, to do this kind of work is involved. A good tactical gunsmith will get .0002 say, maybe 90 percent of the time, with much less set-up work. The other 10 percent will show .0004, or .0005 runout, something like that. Does that matter? Yes, if the difference between first place and tenth place is .03 inches for 100 rounds at 100 yards. No for any sane tactical purpose -- or maybe I'm speaking out of turn. I don't shoot any of these modern "tactical competitions" that have become so popular, so I shouldn't say what they need.
And there is another point: most of the people who respond to you have what I've said as background knowledge. Their answers to specific questions *assume* you already know this stuff. But I'm pretty sure it is new to you. That's a great way to get miscommunication & confusion.
Best way to get the background information, a description of the world benchrest shooters live in, is to read a couple books. (Going to a match helps). A book is where an author, an couple editors, a couple proofreaders, a test audience, etc., have all read the material & spent time & expert knowledge to help communication. On the internet it's "Oh yeah," and "edit post" and "I forgot" or "I'm too tired." & I'm getting too tired...
So, whattaya going to do with this rifle?