As a side note, I always find it a bit funny when fellows calculate and research something that would be safe and easy to test. Years ago, after I explained something related to reloading that I had worked out on my own, thoroughly tested, and explained in detail to a friend, who was having a problem that related, and the first thing out of his mouth was "What's your reference?" as if some joker writing about it in a magazine article would automatically be a superior source on the subject. Calculations can be impressive in their complexity, but if the math is not applied correctly, the results will not depict what happens in the real world. Similarly, test results that come from experiments that differed significantly from the application in question should probably not be taken as immutable truths. A good part of my slight formal exposure to engineering took place in a strength of materials class, where destructive testing played an important role. In the real world, this sort of testing is widely employed...for good reason. IMO, with the usual disclaimers about safety, if you want to know what will happen, why not give it a try?