D
Don
Guest
Ok, since we're sharing crazy ideas.... I'll share one of mine.
Bear with me
Once we've accepted the idea of ANOTHER JOINT of some sort, or another method of fixation....... Howsabout replacing barrels at the neck instead of reaming an entire chamber? KEEP that perfect chamber and just pop on a fresh barrel with a new neck and throat. IF the concept could be proven to work then actions could be made which accept a sleeved chamber, or for that matter an action could be made with the chamber reamed right into the receiver ring which brings us back to one joint.
I'd love to be able to inspect my throat/leade by just looking at it.
I've thought about the sealing issue, I believe that it can be resolved. One of my resolutions includes differential threads like a K&M neckturner which produces incredibly high tension at a vertical joint (and could include indexing now that Gene's brought it to our attention)......... In fact, this is why I bought my lathe. Not for the indexing, I hadn't thought of that, but for exploring the different method of barrel attachment. Unfortunately it's gonna' take 50-100hrs of my limited time just to get the lathe run in, right now it ain't gonna happen for a while.
Hey, I'm just throwing the idea out before the crowd since the crowd IS gathered around nicely....
flame away
al
Off the cuff......... since a multi-part chamber would not appear to save; time, cost, or improve accuracy, I am not sure there will be much of a reason to pursue the idea.
Takes less time and better alignment results in cutting a complete chamber with a single reamer that has all the chamber features ground to final dimensions.
Possible solution looking for a problem, as far as my limited imagination can forsee...................Don