700 Rem Trigger Inconsistencies Help!

S

STBE Harris

Guest
I have an old early 90's Remington LH 700 short action. This started out as a 308Win in a Custom Deluxe wood stock. Since that time it has been thru several incarnations. In any of the phases it has not shot to my expectations. One of the reasons was it has an inconsistent trigger. The original was way heavy so I and my gunsmith a gentlemen who made BR triggers out of Remington triggers adjusted it down to about 2 1/2 lbs. I say about because it never would stay consistent. It went like this 2 1/2 lbs, twice, 3lbs once, 2 once, back to 2 1/2 lbs. 4 times, 3 1/4, etc. It has done this with several different after market triggers. It has had a BR trigger in it and it did the same thing only in degrees of lesser magnitude. It currently is a medium Palma barreled action in a synthetic stock in 308 win. It has a popular common after market trigger in it adjusted to about 2 lbs. When it has a round the chamber it seems to do this to a greater degree. Like the round is exerting some kind of back pressure on the sear arrangement. It can't be the chamber/barrel because this action has now had 3 different barrels on it and still had an inconsistent trigger. I have recently taken the bolt apart and cleaned the bejabbers out of it. I looked for any burrs or unusual wear. I didn't see anything so I lightly oiled it with a gun oil and reassembled it. The current custom after market trigger maker suggested I try a different bolt. I am not capable of resetting the headspace on a new bolt and LH 700 bolts are not cheap or easy to find. I have access to a couple other LH 700 bolts on a friend's rifle I could try dry firing on an empty chamber. I have looked for contact between the stock and trigger and the trigger guards etc. Any suggestions? STBE Harris
 
I have an old early 90's Remington LH 700 short action. This started out as a 308Win in a Custom Deluxe wood stock. Since that time it has been thru several incarnations. In any of the phases it has not shot to my expectations. One of the reasons was it has an inconsistent trigger. The original was way heavy so I and my gunsmith a gentlemen who made BR triggers out of Remington triggers adjusted it down to about 2 1/2 lbs. I say about because it never would stay consistent. It went like this 2 1/2 lbs, twice, 3lbs once, 2 once, back to 2 1/2 lbs. 4 times, 3 1/4, etc. It has done this with several different after market triggers. It has had a BR trigger in it and it did the same thing only in degrees of lesser magnitude. It currently is a medium Palma barreled action in a synthetic stock in 308 win. It has a popular common after market trigger in it adjusted to about 2 lbs. When it has a round the chamber it seems to do this to a greater degree. Like the round is exerting some kind of back pressure on the sear arrangement. It can't be the chamber/barrel because this action has now had 3 different barrels on it and still had an inconsistent trigger. I have recently taken the bolt apart and cleaned the bejabbers out of it. I looked for any burrs or unusual wear. I didn't see anything so I lightly oiled it with a gun oil and reassembled it. The current custom after market trigger maker suggested I try a different bolt. I am not capable of resetting the headspace on a new bolt and LH 700 bolts are not cheap or easy to find. I have access to a couple other LH 700 bolts on a friend's rifle I could try dry firing on an empty chamber. I have looked for contact between the stock and trigger and the trigger guards etc. Any suggestions? STBE Harris

Since a Remington style trigger's function is independent of the Rifle, this is rather strange situation.
If the trigger is sitting square in the action, and nothing is binding, I can't see why it would vary that much in pull weight.

Have you checked to see if the firing pin Spring is coil binding?
 
I think that this is one of those situations where I would have to have the rifle in my hands to figure it out. That being said. the first thing that I would probably do is to switch striker assemblies (pin, cocking piece, firing pin spring, and shroud) with that of another action that does not have this problem. You could even fire it, since the switch would not change the headspace. Sometimes when one installs a trigger when things are not well aligned, pins are driven in place so that side plates are forced in against the top lever, binding it. Check to see that it moves freely when it drops and resets. Also make sure that you have clearance between the tip of the trigger and the trigger guard. If none of this works, I think that you need to find a smith that is good at solving unusual problems.
 
Desparate! Thanks for the suggestio: questions

If I switch the striker assemblies would I have to worry about hurting the borrowed assembly? I sure wouldn't want to ruin another's assembly. Another question is there any concern about this different firing pin and the protrusion through the old bolt shroud's firing pin hole if I tried a firing session? I am trying ladder load tests in it now, but got so annoyed putting up with this trigger I quit and decided to address it again. Another question if another striker assembly works something is amiss in there in the old one. Would it be advisable to polish the those parts? Not the sear engagement areas. Thanks STBE
.
 
I'd try a Jewell trigger on it. I'm like Jackie, pretty hard to see why you are getting so much inconsistency in pull weight. What are you using to measure the weight of pull? I use the NRA stacked weight system on triggers that are as heavy as 2.5 pounds. I have a Lyman digital trigger tester, but it in itself is inconsistent.

Switching striker assemblies will not damage the striker assembly. How much firing protrusion won't make much difference either as long as it has enough to fire the primer. The accepted rule of thumb is .050-.060" firing pin protrusion in the fired position.
 
Last edited:
Mike Howdy

I am using an RCBS trigger pull gauge it was the better model if I remember when I bought it many moons ago. I am sure it is not as accurate as using weights though. It seems to be pretty consistent ( in other words a good action/ trigger that is adjusted two pounds and seems consistent, shows on this gauge to break at the about the same weight point). This trigger shows the inconsistences on the gauge in this action and did on the original Remington trigger, I think when the BR trigger was in it, it was adjusted too low to indicate reliably on this gauge. I am going to change out striker assemblies on this bolt with a known consistent rifle and see what happens it can't hurt it might show me that indeed the trigger fit into the action has a problem. I am thinking that Jewell may not make a left hand trigger with a safety and bolt stop. They make a BR trigger that has neither on it that fits, but this rifle needs to have a safety and bolt stop as I was hoping to use it in the field some. I just measured the ladder load test with 168 SRAMs, 210m primer once fired BR prepped WW cases, one test with Varget and the other with I4895. The 60 shots averaged 1.3 inch at 100. If you take out the shots thrown when this rifle's trigger baulked and weight increased that group would have been close to 2/3 of that. I shot several groups at same time while letting this rifle's barrel cool, with one of your build 308's and they averaged .58 with mixed loads...... sweet things you make Sir! STBE
 
I have an old early 90's Remington LH 700 short action. This started out as a 308Win in a Custom Deluxe wood stock. Since that time it has been thru several incarnations. In any of the phases it has not shot to my expectations. One of the reasons was it has an inconsistent trigger. The original was way heavy so I and my gunsmith a gentlemen who made BR triggers out of Remington triggers adjusted it down to about 2 1/2 lbs. I say about because it never would stay consistent. It went like this 2 1/2 lbs, twice, 3lbs once, 2 once, back to 2 1/2 lbs. 4 times, 3 1/4, etc. It has done this with several different after market triggers. It has had a BR trigger in it and it did the same thing only in degrees of lesser magnitude. It currently is a medium Palma barreled action in a synthetic stock in 308 win. It has a popular common after market trigger in it adjusted to about 2 lbs. When it has a round the chamber it seems to do this to a greater degree. Like the round is exerting some kind of back pressure on the sear arrangement. It can't be the chamber/barrel because this action has now had 3 different barrels on it and still had an inconsistent trigger. I have recently taken the bolt apart and cleaned the bejabbers out of it. I looked for any burrs or unusual wear. I didn't see anything so I lightly oiled it with a gun oil and reassembled it. The current custom after market trigger maker suggested I try a different bolt. I am not capable of resetting the headspace on a new bolt and LH 700 bolts are not cheap or easy to find. I have access to a couple other LH 700 bolts on a friend's rifle I could try dry firing on an empty chamber. I have looked for contact between the stock and trigger and the trigger guards etc. Any suggestions? STBE Harris

My guess would be a trigger timing issue, and as you've tried multiple triggers, I would be looking hard at the cocking piece. It could be what I call too long, meaning the angled surface on the cocking piece, the one that engages the sear, has too much metal on the front of it. This situation puts a lot of downward pressure on the sear connector via the sear, and in my experience, leads to inconsistent pull weights.

If you have a set of dial calipers, take a measurement, with the bolt in the fired position, from the back of the bolt shroud to the back of the cocking piece. Now, pull the bolt back and push it forward as far as it will go, but do not rotate the bolt into battery. Take another measurement. This time you may be measuring from the back of the cocking piece to the back of the bolt shroud. Now, keeping your eye on the cocking piece, rotate the bolt into battery. My guess is you will see it moved rearward...significantly. Take another cocking piece to rear of the bolt shroud measurement. The distance between measurements #2 and #3 is what's called, IIRC, the sear handoff measurement. The distance between measurements #1 and #3 is the firing pin travel distance.

In the case of a sear handoff measurement, again if IIRC, .010 is the ideal number. I would guess that yours is significantly more than that, causing undue pressure between the sear and the sear connector, and quite possibly the angled surfaces of the cocking piece and sear, in turn causing inconsistent trigger pull readings. Especially if you work the bolt with different amounts of force. The fix to all this is removing metal from the front of the angled surface on the cocking piece, ideally, to the point you have the .010 sear handoff measurement.

If you do this, you MUST maintain the angle on present on the cocking piece. If you don't, you will likely have problems. Ask me how I know...

Another way to check all this is to pull the barreled action out of the stock, and while watching the sear and sear connector through the little window on the trigger housing, work the bolt forward, but not into battery. If, when doing this, the sear contacts the sear connector, your cocking piece is too long, as described above. The act of rotating the bolt into battery should bring these two surfaces together. Now rotate the bolt into battery, keeping in mind the rearward movement of the cocking piece (action/reaction), and you can picture the increase in downward pressure caused by the too long cocking piece. Now imagine working the bolt with vigor vs. working the bolt gently and think about the ramifications...especially considering the tolerances present to allow all those bits and pieces to move freely. Could the cocking piece and sear, and the sear and the sear connector, be locking-up, or engaging differently from shot to shot?

This, if I understand it all correctly, is the issue of trigger timing. I FOUGHT with Remington triggers and inconsistent pull weights until I learned the above.

Caveat: You'll note the liberal use of "IIRC" throughout my reply. I am currently at work, screwing around on Benchrest Central and not working, trying not to be found out by my boss, and am typing my reply by memory. And my memory is as long as my...uhhh...you-know-what. All my notes are at home...but I think I'm close. If somebody here sees something glaring, by all means, point it out. I don't want to put bad info out there.

Or you can do what I used to do when having this problem, which was to get into my stash of Remington trigger parts and start swapping parts, hoping to cure the problem. Sometimes it got a little better...sometimes it got worse. Never once, though, did I change, or modify the cocking piece. Hmmmm...

The ABSOLUTE BEST thing you can do, in my humble opinion, before you do anything I suggest, is to grab a cup of coffee, a pad of paper and a pen, and call Dan from Accu-Tig (Dan's 40X on the forum here), and tell him what's happening with your trigger. And let the learning begin. This is how I learned the above, and every time I talk to Dan, I learn something new. Great guy, and first class service and work.

Hope this helps,
Justin
 
I am using an RCBS trigger pull gauge it was the better model if I remember when I bought it many moons ago. I am sure it is not as accurate as using weights though. It seems to be pretty consistent ( in other words a good action/ trigger that is adjusted two pounds and seems consistent, shows on this gauge to break at the about the same weight point). This trigger shows the inconsistences on the gauge in this action and did on the original Remington trigger, I think when the BR trigger was in it, it was adjusted too low to indicate reliably on this gauge. I am going to change out striker assemblies on this bolt with a known consistent rifle and see what happens it can't hurt it might show me that indeed the trigger fit into the action has a problem. I am thinking that Jewell may not make a left hand trigger with a safety and bolt stop. They make a BR trigger that has neither on it that fits, but this rifle needs to have a safety and bolt stop as I was hoping to use it in the field some. I just measured the ladder load test with 168 SRAMs, 210m primer once fired BR prepped WW cases, one test with Varget and the other with I4895. The 60 shots averaged 1.3 inch at 100. If you take out the shots thrown when this rifle's trigger baulked and weight increased that group would have been close to 2/3 of that. I shot several groups at same time while letting this rifle's barrel cool, with one of your build 308's and they averaged .58 with mixed loads...... sweet things you make Sir! STBE

You should be able to lift the bolt handle straight up and close it straight down with only however much extraction camming your action has moving your bolt back and your action will be cocked ready to fire. If you have to pull the bolt rearward for the rifle to cock when you're closing the bolt, then the bolt is cocking on closing and isn't fully cocking on opening. This is part of the trigger timing to which Justin is referring. Jewell does make a left handed HVR with bolt release and left handed safety for 700 actions. If the cocking piece drops very much when you lift it straight up and then close it straight back down when it you close the bolt, the bolt may not have enough firing pin fall.
 
As you rotate the bolt on a LH Remington the threads of the shroud draw it into the bolt body because it is prevented from rotating with the bolt( the opposite happens when you do the same thing on a RH action) so your reference point is in a different position when the bolt handle is up, compare to when it is down.
 
Something I learned over the years. After installing a Remington factory trigger I always take a punch, and from the top, tap/spread the trigger housing at the rear trigger pin. Mismatched holes allow the pin to either pinch the top lever or interfere with the cocking piece.
 
Something I learned over the years. After installing a Remington factory trigger I always take a punch, and from the top, tap/spread the trigger housing at the rear trigger pin. Mismatched holes allow the pin to either pinch the top lever or interfere with the cocking piece.

I've seen the same thing even with Jewell triggers that get pinched when the pins are driven in and have to spread the side plates back out where they were pinched.
 
Howdy all again LH 700 Trigger

I just got back from deer camp we had a run in with a bee hive in the tree next to the feeder. Long day and nite (we finally pulled the feeder down at 11pm bees dormant? ) no bites on me. Justin I will try measuring that bolt in the locations described here asap. Mike this rifle will catch and cock the sear about maybe 70+ percent of the time. Otherwise you have to pull the bolt back a little bit to get it to cock. I can't tell you for sure as I was not paying attention but I know I had to retry cocking it several times. That is on an empty chamber. With cartridges it cocks every time never had any problem. I wouldn't want to be grinding/stoning on the front angle of the cocking piece. I am sure I would get the angle off or take too much off. I think what I will do first is switch the striker assembly out with a known good rifle. Do the same measurements and compare. Then shoot it. May put the "bad" one in the good rifle and see if I get the same problem with it. That would isolate the striker as the problem. Brownells has new striker assemblies for $60-70 ...money. I assume that the striker is non-specific as far as left or right hand? Don't want to have to buy another one particularly. I will get back with you'all this will take a while. Thank you all so much for your help. STBE Harris
 
I just got back from deer camp we had a run in with a bee hive in the tree next to the feeder. Long day and nite (we finally pulled the feeder down at 11pm bees dormant? ) no bites on me. Justin I will try measuring that bolt in the locations described here asap. Mike this rifle will catch and cock the sear about maybe 70+ percent of the time. Otherwise you have to pull the bolt back a little bit to get it to cock. I can't tell you for sure as I was not paying attention but I know I had to retry cocking it several times. That is on an empty chamber. With cartridges it cocks every time never had any problem. I wouldn't want to be grinding/stoning on the front angle of the cocking piece. I am sure I would get the angle off or take too much off. I think what I will do first is switch the striker assembly out with a known good rifle. Do the same measurements and compare. Then shoot it. May put the "bad" one in the good rifle and see if I get the same problem with it. That would isolate the striker as the problem. Brownells has new striker assemblies for $60-70 ...money. I assume that the striker is non-specific as far as left or right hand? Don't want to have to buy another one particularly. I will get back with you'all this will take a while. Thank you all so much for your help. STBE Harris

The same firing pin assembly fits into the left hand action as it does in the right hand action. The only difference is that with the left handed action, the shroud closes up closer to the rear of the bolt as it is closed and with the right handed action the shroud gets farther away as the bolt is closed.
 
Replaced firing pin assembly

Howdy got to go out and shoot. I switched out the striker assembly with another from 700 SA rifle of known trigger reliability and shot over 40 shots most were in a "ladder" load test. This set up pretty much worked. There were much less inconsistencies in the pull. I noticed what little there was but most shooters would not. I didn't get to measure it on a gauge but it worked pretty good. I also found that the load did not shoot accurately in the rifle. I think the throat is too short on this barrel and the bullets have to sit too deep into the neck of the cartridge. My fault I wanted a short throat. Anyway now I have to figure out what to do to the striker assembly to get it to work reliably. First though I will have to buy a tool to get the firing pin out so I can check out the parts and machining at that level. I plan using your suggestions researching a fix. Thank you STBE
PS ...I did put my striker assembly into the other 700 and dry fired it several times I couldn't determine much. The problem was always much worse with a round in the chamber and I didn't get to fire this rifle.
 
My battle

Get this..
I'm new here and I've got an issue

Pre 64 Model 700 ADL 7MM Mag., Bell and Carlisle bedded stock
I tried Setting the pull on an original Walker trigger

With the barreled action out the trigger pull weight changes each time I fire it. It climbs up to 7.5 then drops off to 2.5 lbs. This happens every time if the action is bolted in or not.

There must be something bent inside the trigger assem. is all I can figure.
The guy I bought this rifle from swears he was hand loading 175 grain mag tips and running them thru a chronograph and was getting nearly 3200 fps.

THATS WAY OVER SAMMI specs.!!

Im NOT bad mouthing anyone let alone this rifle. In fact about 9 years ago I took it into a gunsmith who used a NO GO gauge in it and told me the chamber was unsafe. Its pre 64 so he set the barrel back.

This trigger assembly is not safe IMHO because it is all over the place.

I called Timney Triggers and spoke with their tech support.

The tech guy was cool and very knowledgeable.
I detailed the issue for him. He asked a couple questions.

I told him about the former owner overloading his reloads. He said that even though there are no pins that go through the assembly, there are pivot pins on some of the parts like the sear and that its a friction fit between the sides. He suspects that the cheap tin body which have holes in them for those pivots has probably ovaled out.

He told me he's seen this before on older muzzle loaders that were overloaded but this was the first time he'd heard of it in the big magnum.

He said that it's his guess that probably the assembly is defective. He recommended that I contact Remington and see if they can do anything or just save my money and buy a new trigger.

I called Remington. The people were very nice and I was honest with them and told them the issue was probably caused by overloaded handloads. I was instructed to fill out a form and get into the class action suit that is soon to be complete.

The serial number indicates that this rifle was built in 1962.

They told me that they will replace the trigger with the newest X-Mark Pro externally adjustable unit because my model 700 fits this class action. They also said they will pay for the shipping both ways to my door.

I sent in the beginning paperwork.


After weeks of waiting I called Remington and was told they are still litigating and it could be quite a while.
I found a new XMark trigger on ebay and purchased it.

Any thoughts?

Bill
 
IME, the trigger inconsistencies of the Remington 700 is directly related to the whys and hows of the recall. The part inside the trigger, known as the trigger connector, can float around inside the housing. This is the part that actually disconnects the trigger from the sear. It's captive, but not to the point that it has zero movement.

Your case is possibly different in that it was worked on previously. When I work over a 700 trigger in the past, I solder the trigger to the trigger connector, eliminating any possible movement there. If this is not done, it's likely that sear engagement is varying from shot to shot.

With the good aftermarket triggers that are available..none of which use this trigger connector part, I prefer to simply put a known good trigger in when possible.

My guess is that this is where the inconsistency is coming from. It is something that will have to be diagnosed by a qualified smith or by simply changing triggers.

This trigger connector is IMO, the fault for the recall due to the fact that over time, dust, dirt, oils, etc, get between the trigger and this connector and reduce sear engagement. --Mike Ezell
 
OP,
I would venture to say that your issue is w/ mis-matched firing pin assy parts.

Standard to ISS/J Lock firing pin parts that DO NOT interchange.
 
Back
Top