ok, lemmesee, where did i ever see uncleb on a match report,, let alone a top 20 equipment list??
People, to have any credibility at all with serious benchresters, use your real name or some reference to who you are, you don't have to possess 150 hof points, or even a single hof point, but at least go to benchrest shoots and participate!!!!
"hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
lemmings ??
not..well not at the top.
but lemmings are those that buy the same equipment as the top 10/top 20......but have no clue.
they do not understand why , if they have the same stuff, they do not have the same results..they THINK it is an equipment race....
but it is not , it is a skill contest...and some just do not have the skill, but can afford the equipment."
Oh come on StoolinCO.
Francis I find it odd that mike considers all but in the top 20 " lemmings", Has no clue that there were a number of h.o.f. shooters and many with points that did not make the top 20, for what ever reason missed condition, lost load or barrel wasn't up to par this year, cross fire. This doesn't mean they are incapable just wasn't there time. Maybe he can go to a real registered match to see how it really is. By the way it is a equipment race, or so a h.o.f. shooter says...
Just my 0.02
some forms of shooting are becoming very closed doors to some of the newer shooters. clicks of people, special rules, systems, points, dues, etc. all have contributed to a lot of people not trying some of these "BIG" matches and getting involved. I am not pointing out any group just making a blank statement. I do believe there are a lot of shooters capable of winning or at least competing at these matches that stick to smaller local stuff for either reasons above or just because that's what time or the $$$ allows.
Just my 0.02
some forms of shooting are becoming very closed doors to some of the newer shooters. clicks of people, special rules, systems, points, dues, etc. all have contributed to a lot of people not trying some of these "BIG" matches and getting involved. I am not pointing out any group just making a blank statement. I do believe there are a lot of shooters capable of winning or at least competing at these matches that stick to smaller local stuff for either reasons above or just because that's what time or the $$$ allows.
Benchrest, as we know it, 100/200, was started to be a development bed for improving rifle accuracy. Read the stated purpose of each.
Modern day benchrest has turned into a monkey-see-monkey-do. Sad but true.
Just my 0.02
some forms of shooting are becoming very closed doors to some of the newer shooters. clicks of people, special rules, systems, points, dues, etc. all have contributed to a lot of people not trying some of these "BIG" matches and getting involved. I am not pointing out any group just making a blank statement. I do believe there are a lot of shooters capable of winning or at least competing at these matches that stick to smaller local stuff for either reasons above or just because that's what time or the $$$ allows.
I have a difficult time figuring out why Jim Kelbly is being criticized for being proud of the products he make and sells.
Look toward the top of the page. See that banner ad? That's paid advertising. That's why and that's the only reason.
If that's the reason that Jim is being criticized for his post, then I don't understand that. As the Kelbly's are paid advertisers on benchrest.com and have been ever since it was created.