B
BennieDaBlade
Guest
Hello folks,
After trawling the web for a few weeks I have yet to find an answer to aide my final decision. I have found many comments, none overly convincing either way.
I am looking to restock my Win 52D in a target stock and my question is this;
Irrespective of stock design/shape, if the action is correctly pillar bedded and the barrel floated, what is the better material? Full wood, laminate, or "something other than wood".
I have read that wood "soaks up" the vibration of firing better then the others, but is susceptible to movement. (I don't see how this is an issue if it is bedded and floated.)
I have read that laminates are very stable, and heavy, but offer the same as a full wood stock. (comes down to a personal preferance)
I have read that other materials can be better or worse than the two above depending on their quality. (some standard items from the original firearm manufacturers being likened to licorice)
I have only owned long arms with "wooded" stocks, as much from aesthetic choice as functionality.
What are you learned thoughts for someone who is not looking to take on the top level of competition, but at the same time values greatly the ability to be competitive?
I look forward to some interesting answers.
Nigel (indecisive Aussy)
After trawling the web for a few weeks I have yet to find an answer to aide my final decision. I have found many comments, none overly convincing either way.
I am looking to restock my Win 52D in a target stock and my question is this;
Irrespective of stock design/shape, if the action is correctly pillar bedded and the barrel floated, what is the better material? Full wood, laminate, or "something other than wood".
I have read that wood "soaks up" the vibration of firing better then the others, but is susceptible to movement. (I don't see how this is an issue if it is bedded and floated.)
I have read that laminates are very stable, and heavy, but offer the same as a full wood stock. (comes down to a personal preferance)
I have read that other materials can be better or worse than the two above depending on their quality. (some standard items from the original firearm manufacturers being likened to licorice)
I have only owned long arms with "wooded" stocks, as much from aesthetic choice as functionality.
What are you learned thoughts for someone who is not looking to take on the top level of competition, but at the same time values greatly the ability to be competitive?
I look forward to some interesting answers.
Nigel (indecisive Aussy)