C
Changeling
Guest
Have you guys that campaign/shoot wit the Tubb rifles in 6XC experienced any problems with them?
Changeling,
You have me a bit confused, the Tubb 2000 is a bolt action rifle with a five shot detachable magazine. The main design of this rifle was for the NRA across the course shooters but it works equally well for NRA mid and long range prone shooting.
I own two Tubb rifles, both bought used and I have put at least two thousand rounds through each rifle since I bought them. I have had no malfunctions with them. I have shot out one 6xc barrel. I think they are a very reliable rifle.
IIRC, he used two. 6.5-284 and 6.5-08.David Tubb did try to make a match rifle out of a SR-25 but I do not remember the caliber.
I've met lots of shooters who won using "inferior" equipment. Some of them even beat LR benchresters at their own game, despite shooting from prone. The latter isn't likely to happen today, but it happened more than once in the past - and it wasn't a fluke. It's the rifleman that makes the ultimate difference. And before you say it, we are not talking about benchrest in this thread (or this forum). Despite the similarities, F-Class is NOT benchrest. The shooter matters more - this is the last I will say on this topic.First of all, I CANNOT get behind the tired old "It's the archer, not the bow" saw........ in large part IT IS THE BOW! Bar nothing, the best "archer" on earth WILL NOT WIN with inferior equipment.
Poor choice - 800-1200 rounds, and the barrel is toast. The 6XC and the like were designed to provide near-.243 performance in a shorter package, while delivering accuracy and longer (about 2-3x) barrel life. Big deal you say? Consider this: LR highpower shooters can fire ~200 rounds a weekend. May not seem like much until you consider:I would suggest that you consider the .243 Win cartridge over the 6XC.
I personally would not choose Les Baer. Not when other smiths can do work as good or better - and do it faster for less cost.If it were my build, I'd send an SR-25 off to Les Baer, or at least call him about the concept.
Chambering an SR-25/AR-10 in 6XC is fairly trivial, since the work has been done by several smiths for at least five years. If the factories had the reamers and the demand, it would be easy for them to build rifles in 6XC. The tricky part is on the shooter end. Get the load wrong (use a powder with the wrong burn rate), and the rifle short cycles or tears case rims.Now, as per your question. As far as I know your quest will end only with a custom rifle as there is nothing currently available in a 6XC or similar in an accurate semi-auto.
At least one knowledgeable gunsmith thinks the SR-25 is not a good choice for a donor platform, due to the path through which the round feeds through the magazine through the chamber. However, this matters if you only shoot through the magazine - LR prone/F-Class is a single load proposition. Still, the AR-10 is a better choice than the SR-25 because:There is only one platform upon which to build IMO, this being the Stoner SR-25 or a souped up AR-10 although in my limited experience the AR-10's just haven't been up to snuff.
I had a T2K for a long time and it is difficult to shoot off bags. Once I learned how and made some hand guard and buttstock changes it was a hammer. I had rebarreled mine to 6CM and shot nothing but 115s.
All that changed last fall after shooting a match with Kelly McMillan. Sold it and all my McMillan stocks the following week.
Post it to Gunbroker (or a similar site) and find out. But don't list your address, as you may be mobbed by buyers. Just a guess on the latter though. (FYI, right now, there is a shortage of AR-15/clones and parts to build them.)BTW, This thing about a shortage of Stoners..... So is now a good time to sell one? I've been thinking of it.
Comments like yours above should be explained, or left unsaid.