Zero freebore makes some sense in a "Match" reamer. Suppose you start shooting when the 180-gr Berger is popular. That is a long bullet; takes a lot of freebore, and you have a reamer ground with the freebore for it.
Days (weeks, months) pass. Now, for some reason, your rifle won't shoot the 180 -- or more likely, everybody decides a new bullet, say a 140-grain whatever, -- is the cat's pajamas. With the freebore needed for the 180, you can't shoot the new bullet without too much bullet jump. You need a new reamer for the new bullet.
So, from that perspective, a reamer that has no freebore is a plus. For an extra, one-time $75 or so for a throater, you save the cost of a new chamber reamer when you decide to change bullets.
BTW, I'd check to see if it is "zero freebore" as opposed to "zero throat." If only the freebore is zero, you will still have a leade angle -- probably 1.5 degrees half-cone angle. In that case, your throater should have the same. But if it is "zero throat", there will be no leade, and you can use whatever leade angle you want on the throater -- or get several throaters with different leade angles, if you want.
All this planning ahead might sense to a full-blooded competitor,esp. one with tight pockets who doesn't want to spring for a new reamer with each change.
Finally, I'd recommend the kind of throating reamer that can be used with a T-handle as well as a lathe. We do most of our throating with the barrel installed in the action, using a delrin guide for the T-handle, and a stop to get the length of the throat just right. Others may prefer to cut the throat when the barrel is first chambered, i.e., stil in the lathe. Again, just more options.