Now let's get on with it!! I have always felt that one set of rules across the country was the best way to go. I always felt that we had the rules pretty well established- if you built a gun to Williamsport classification then you could shoot anywhere in the country. I will however change that stance to whatever my club wants to do, if we accomodate more shooters by tweeking the rules then lets get on with it!!!!!!!!!!! I dare say that if the rules were changed in Williamsport it would have a dramatic impact on every club across the country. Lets not be the anchor on this boat, lets be the engine.
That is an excellent statement Frank and if 10 shots is being discussed then that would be for the betterment of the sport. The course of fire would be a point of contention though. I'm refering to the NBRSA.
H-Bar
As for your statements , I am not pushing for anything that benifits me at all and never have. Please explain what has ever been self serving or ever benifited me in any way at Williamsport or Reade? I'm not that good of a shooter anyway so really nothing could ever benifit me. I do like a level playing field for everyone though and that's where the rule structure came in. I am for the change that John and Dianne have made at Reade range because I think it will bring in new shooters especially with a "factory class" added this year. Again, this does not benifit me at all. Not sure if I'll shot the factory class but, maybe just to add numbers of shooters. Over the years at Williamsport, I was for the rule structure of the guns and being on the rules committee tried to make sure the guns met all of the criteria set forth.
I won't build a new gun for a wide open 17# class. I will continue to shoot my old Williamsport legal 16 1/2# rifle at Reade.
Quite possibly, you might understand the operations and future of the Williamport range better had you ever been a Board member which I don't think you are/were.
Joe
Regardless of what you say, I don't think "anyone" from the Reade organization was supporting you when and for the reason the change was made. It was done "only" because of a factory class being added this year and I think John and Dianne wanted to make sure that the new factory class guns with a 1" diameter muzzle could be shot in the light gun class. Hence, the rule change to bring in new shooters who want more shooting and could enter their factory rifle in the light gun class. It was a very good idea from the Hoovers. You said last year Bruce passed a pitition around to open up the light gun class to 17# with no restrictions. How many signed it?
As per your last statement in your post, you have my permission to take "me" off your support list. My support is for John and Dianne and the Reade range and will stay that way. "They" have certainly taken the lead in implementing the new rule change decision.
Later
Darryl