Al,
Have you ever measured primers? If not, you may want to try it sometime. I measured ten Wolf SRM's (what I had at the time) and found 0.005" difference in cup height, 0.006" difference in anvil protrusion, and 0.003" difference in total primer height. Thus if one seats primers to a given dimension set in the priming tool, then they are getting a range of crush values.
This variation in primer dimensions raises a fundamental question that I think may be important: What is it that we want to be the same every time? Is it the crush of the anvil into the primer compound, or the seating of the cup relative to the primer pocket? If we make one consistent, then the other won't be, not without measuring and selecting primers with particular dimensions. K&M makes a primer tool (
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xxRZsPjfzHk) that, if you insert the primer upside down in the measuring position, will make the anvil crush consistent. I don't know of a commercially available product to make the cup seating consistent. One could bore a hole for the anvils to extend into in the shelf of the K&M tool to accomplish this.
I shot groups with primers seated with consistent anvil crush with the K&M tool, and primers seated by feel with a Lee. There was no statistically significant difference in the groups. I am curious if anyone has gotten different results. Maybe there really is a difference, but it takes more shots to see, or maybe I was especially good that day with the Lee. It would be interesting to seat some primers poorly on purpose, and see if it changed the results.
Cheers,
Keith