C
cris
Guest
"It could be a stabilization issue,"
I have a huge amount of respect for Todd Banks but too many more quotes like the one above and nights without sleep might change that.
The quote is regarding why a barrel/pellet combination might shoot very well indoors but could be a loser outdoors.
Conversations with friends that have PhD after their names and consult to NASA have been interesting. Terms like, wobble, increased time in flight and surface area exposure have come up. Some of this would explain why one lot of pellets actually does do better than another lot of the same pellet. The occasional "flyer" might have it's roots right here.
Harmonics, air density and launch angle were discussed as possible causes. I was told that high speed photography and proper lighting might lead to some answers and possibly, more questions. I am ready to re=enter school, again, and prepare a thesis, if Bill Gates will finance the project.
Or, maybe we just need better pellets.
I have a huge amount of respect for Todd Banks but too many more quotes like the one above and nights without sleep might change that.
The quote is regarding why a barrel/pellet combination might shoot very well indoors but could be a loser outdoors.
Conversations with friends that have PhD after their names and consult to NASA have been interesting. Terms like, wobble, increased time in flight and surface area exposure have come up. Some of this would explain why one lot of pellets actually does do better than another lot of the same pellet. The occasional "flyer" might have it's roots right here.
Harmonics, air density and launch angle were discussed as possible causes. I was told that high speed photography and proper lighting might lead to some answers and possibly, more questions. I am ready to re=enter school, again, and prepare a thesis, if Bill Gates will finance the project.
Or, maybe we just need better pellets.