P.O. Ackley II vo; boolk set ?

C

Curly

Guest
P.O. Ackley II vol book set ?

Which of the two is more about the ackley caibers/experements? I have read them and can't remember which is which.Want to compare the 30-06 line of misc improements.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The first book has the info you need, the second is some later data that was left out or on newer cartridges. Good shooting, Gary
 
I don't have my set in front of me but as I recall there is information in both of them that could help you.

I believe that the information that P. O. Ackley put in his wonderful books are out of date due to more and better powders. Ackley's work is 40 and 50 years old now.

Bill Wynne
 
P.O. Ackley

I don't have my set in front of me but as I recall there is information in both of them that could help you.

I believe that the information that P. O. Ackley put in his wonderful books are out of date due to more and better powders. Ackley's work is 40 and 50 years old now.

Bill Wynne

It would be interesting, to quite a few, if someone would publish a reloading manual for all the Ackley chamberings with current powders in mind. The Sierra manual has the most, with a couple in the Nosler manual but they are not totally inclusive. Such a manual would probably have a pretty good audience.

Lou Baccino
 
After you've referred to Ackley's loading data for a while, you'll come to realize that P.O. was quite the optimist!

Fred Zeglin's recent book may help those that can't find Ackley's books.

BTW, I've heard of several attempts by individuals to update Ackley's data, but other than the book Fred's book, none have been published that I know of.

Good shooting!:cool:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It is my opinon that Ackley's data is a relivant today as it ever was, at least for the powders that remain. A lot of his published data came from others and is noted as such. Speeds tended to be optomistic but that was before the days of inexpensive, easily available and easy to use chronographs.

Poplular web myth says cannister powders have "changed" over the years and old data should not be used. Not so. NO maker would be so silly as to change the characteristics of any cannister powder, that's the whole point of cannister. New powders are given new designations. Both legal liabilty and common sense demands that be so.

Use common practice when developing a load with new OR old powder and data, all will be well. If anyone ignores common sense practices then nothing we do is safe.

Ackley's Handbook for Shooters and Reloaders is in two volumes because there was too much for a single volume. Anyone wanting that info should obtain both volumes, otherwise you only have half of a very good source of load info, wildcat and commercial, plus a LOT of other excellant and still relivant information.
 
Back
Top