D
decr8er
Guest
Let me preface this by saying that I have no business looking at a new scope....at least for now...or next week (whichever comes first). However, if I were actively looking for a new scope, which of these two scopes have superior optics and/or mechanics. Is it A) the Weaver 36x X40mm T-series? Or #2 the Leupold 30x X40mm FX-III series?
All things being equal, as far as optical clarity, I would lean towards the Weaver. It has a lower cost, 1/8 MOA(vs. 1/4) and a higher magnification. But, then again, Leupold is known for the clarity of their optics, so their 30x may be a more efficient tool in the long run.
Does anyone have experience with both? I have shot many Leupold's, but have never used a Weaver. How is the picture through a Weaver?
Thanks in advance, tim
All things being equal, as far as optical clarity, I would lean towards the Weaver. It has a lower cost, 1/8 MOA(vs. 1/4) and a higher magnification. But, then again, Leupold is known for the clarity of their optics, so their 30x may be a more efficient tool in the long run.
Does anyone have experience with both? I have shot many Leupold's, but have never used a Weaver. How is the picture through a Weaver?
Thanks in advance, tim