I said I would rechamber it, and I did.

F

frwillia

Guest
Yesterday was a really fun day. Shortly after noon, this was the situation - barrel was in metal cutting saw and I was getting ready to flip the switch and saw the old chamber off.

PointofNoReturn-RS.jpg


While it wasn't exactly a Mylanta moment, it was sure close. I flipped the switch and a few minutes later it looked like this. For all of you experienced folks, this might not be a big deal, but for a first timer, it was a moment of considerable trepidation.

Nowitreallyneedsachamber-RS.jpg


From there on things got better and better. I got it aligned through the headstock. I used Gritter's method since there was nothing of the original chamber left. When I was done and had it like I wanted it, the muzzle OD was making a 0.013" orbit. Then it was ready to thread.

readytotocutthreads-A-RS.jpg


Many years ago I made a cross slide stop to use for threading. Not as elegant as the one on my South Bend, but it works just fine for getting the cross slide back to datum after disengaging the half nuts, or flipping the lathe in reverse, and giving the cross slide a wrist flip to clear the shoulder, or threads, as the case may be.

Also many years ago I pattern drilled the back of my lathe's cross slide so I can mount all manner of gadgets on it including a rear tool post.

homemadethreadStop-C-RS.jpg


The threading was routine. I had earlier gotten data from the factory threads, as suggested, and used that to get in the ball park, then worked my way into a nice thread fit a little at a time.

The chambering was a learning experience. I took advantage of the time to go to school on the process.

I spent the time chambering practicing hitting marks, cleaning the chamber, making a measurement, and so forth. By 2/3'd depth I could hit the marks to half a thou. The result was that by the time it was crucial to make that "last cut" and get the head space right it was a well rehersed process and worked perfectly. I'd recommend this to all first timers.

The attachment I made (a shamless copy of those made by many others) to take advantage of a dial indicator on the tail stock turned out to be a huge success. By the time I was done I could basically split the lines on the indicator dial and know exactly when the reamer would start to cut.

I locked the carriage in position and used it as a tail stock stop as was suggested by another on this forum. That worked extremely well and allowed me to be able to re-start the cut in the middle of the line where it ended, cycling the tail stock back a foot to get lots of room between cuts.

Necessity is the mother of invention, so I made a home made pusher and held the reamer from turning by using my second smallest lathe dog clamped on the flat. The pusher was a flat surface in the tailstock. I made a radiused piece to screw into the back of the JGS reamer (1/4-28 threaded hole) that pressed against the lubricated flat face. I believe it ended up with me making a reamer sized hole. With 0.025" to go, I tried gently to move the reamer in the chamber and it had exactly zero play which leads me to believe the chamber is properly sized. Since it was completed, I've tried brass in it and it seems to fit just like it should.

I figured that the assymetrical force to counter act the cutting torque was the enemy so I worked slowly at minimum rpm to a) minimze the chance of having an over size chamber, and b) maintain a continuous cut to obviate chips getting under reamer flutes. I terminated the cut by letting go of the lathe dog, backing off the tail stock, and letting the reamer rorate with the chamber till it was stopped, then I drew it straight out.

Intermediate inspections showed the chamber walls to be shiny smooth with no evidence of chip galling. there may be better ways to do it, but this worked for me.

Early in the process I was able to take cuts of as much as 0.050" with no problem. However, as the depth increased, the reamer seemed to fill with chips faster, doubtless because the cutting surface was increasing rapidly, and I began using 0.025" depth of cut as the rule between reamer cleaning sessions. I figured if chips were squeezing out the back, it was time to let go, back off the tail stock, turn it off, remove it and clean it. That is what I did.

I set a wide mouth plastic container of cutting oil and another of mineral spirits on the gear head. I swished the reamer in the mineral spirits and blew it off with compressed air, blew out the chamber with compressed air, visually checked for residual swarf and removed any if it was there, before dipping the reamer in the dark thread cutting oil, reinserting it, and taking the next cut. I developed a technique where I could slide the tailstock up against the carriage, hold the lathe dog, start the spindle, and "touch off" the reamer into a gentle continuous cut. This came together early in the process.

As time and finances permit, I "will" add a muzzle flush system, but a borescope and a better DIT are higher on the wish list.

I cut the bevels on the breech (OD and chamber ID) end the same size as those on the factory chamber.

When I was done it looked like this:

Houstonwehaveachamber-C-RS.jpg


and this

ThisRiflecouldShoot-C-RS.jpg


As originally finished the action needed to be rotated an additional 110 degrees to point the barrel up. I left it in the headstock last night to think about it. This morning I decided to go ahead, adjust the chamber depth and face the breech end of the barrel to point the barrel up, which I did with no surprises along the way.

The rifle is all reassembled, scope mounted, and ready for a range trip. Alas, I have other commitments that will put off the range trip till at least Tuesday next week. It will be agonizing waiting that long to see if it shoots, but that's life.

I sure appreciate all that I learned on this forum. You folks sharing your experience and insight paid a huge part in making this a successful project.

Fitch
 
frwillia
I enjoy reading your posts, great write up and nice large clear pics! congratulations on the re-thread/chamber, and I hope that she turns out to be a shooter.

KB
 
Nice work & write up.
I see you put a chamfer on the chamber like Savage does, I did on my first Savage barrel too, just because the Savage barrels I looked at were that way. I have since found it to be unnecessary. I prefer to keep the cartridge supported as far back as possible. Now I just run a piece of emery on it (like Gordy does)to remove any sharp edge.

James
 
Nice work & write up.
I see you put a chamfer on the chamber like Savage does, I did on my first Savage barrel too, just because the Savage barrels I looked at were that way. I have since found it to be unnecessary. I prefer to keep the cartridge supported as far back as possible. Now I just run a piece of emery on it (like Gordy does)to remove any sharp edge.

James

I just learned something. Like you, I did it because that was how the factory barrel was set up. The chamfer on the OD seems to be needed, but it is really good to know the one in the chamber isn't needed. I would prefer to keep the cartridge supported as far back as possible as well. It just makes sense to do that.

Thanks
Fitch
 
Fitch, the chamber looks good but why did you choose to let the muzzle flop around, then go to the extra effort of having to index the barrel??
Your 0.013" muzzle orbiting has moved the barrel's POI about 2" at 100 yards. That is not a great amount but where did this indexing and POI shift add value??
 
Fitch, the chamber looks good but why did you choose to let the muzzle flop around, then go to the extra effort of having to index the barrel??
Your 0.013" muzzle orbiting has moved the barrel's POI about 2" at 100 yards. That is not a great amount but where did this indexing and POI shift add value??

My 8-32 power scope (A Bushnel 4200 elite) for this rifle only has 20 minutes of elevation and windage range bottom to top. side to side. the specs say 20 minutes, but frankly the specs on the scope are beyond charitable. It only has about 16 or 17 minutes of usable travel. Had i realized that at the time of purchase, I wouldn't have bought it.

Before all this work, the rifle hit 3+ minutes low and about a foot left at 100 yards when I used fixed mounts and the scope centered. So after zeroing it left me 7 minutes of remaining elevation travel and still shooting 2" left with no windage adjustment left.

To have some margin, I need 10 minutes of scope travel above the 100 yard zero to compete in the local combined score ground hog matches at 200,300, and 500 yards. The 75g load for the rifle needs 7+ minutes above the 100 yard zero to get to 500 yards. And of course, I need some windage adjustment.

I "fixed" this by using steel Millet windage adjustable mounts and a Ken Ferrel 10 minute rail (a beautifully made product by the way). That put the scope 3 minutes above the bottom and allowed me to get to 500 yards. A 5 minute rail would have been ideal but Ken doesn't make one of those and at the time I needed it like yesterday.

With that as backbround, the extra effort was to see if I could get it centered for windage and maybe not have to use the rail which raises the scope up higher than I'd like for a good shooting position.

As received from the factory the rifle took some effort to get on paper. I'll be interested to see if this is any better.

There is an implicet assumption built into this that I didn't check, which is that the bore at the muzzle is pointed about the same direction as the barrel is pointing. In truth the last inch or so of bore cound be pointing in any direction within some practical magnitude limits.

What I would have liked to do, was stick a bore site laser in the bore at the muzzle, rotate it to put the dot at top dead center and set the headspace for that condition. I didn't have a laser, and didn't want to order one, so I just centered the barrel OD at top dead center.

Next time I may use a laser to see what the difference is.

Fitch
 
Fitch,
If you indicate the muzzle when you crown it like you did the chamber end you can tell what direction the last 2" of the barrel is pointing in relation to the rest of the barrel.

James
 
Fitch,
If you indicate the muzzle when you crown it like you did the chamber end you can tell what direction the last 2" of the barrel is pointing in relation to the rest of the barrel.

James

I crowned it before I chambered it - I wrote that data down someplace, I need to find it. The barrel is where it is now, I'm not going to move it, but it will be interesting to see how the muzzle data relates to how the barrel is oriented now.

At this point, the best thing is to get it to the range and shoot it.

Fitch
 
Works for me. I'm sure it will be easier to get on paper than before.
 
Orienting the barrel was worth the effort.

Jerry,

You asked a good question about why I bothered to point the barrel up in the vertical plane. I'm experienced challenged, this being my first ever chambering job, but my hope was that I'd be able to have the scope centered with out using the Millet windage rings and able to make elevation to shoot 500 meters in the local Ground Hog match with out having to use the 10 MOA rail.

I succeeded.

With the scope mounted on a flat one piece base using Warne rings (that have no adjustment at all) the rifle zeros at 100 yards with the windage 3 moa right of mid range on the scope, and the elevation 6 MOA off the bottom of the range.

I am very pleased with this result. Was it worth the effort to reorient the barrel? Definitely. Will I do it again? Oh yeah! I love it when a plan comes together. :D

I've put 25 break in rounds through the new chamber and then, after a five shot group with the break in load, fired 5 rounds of my best estimate (using QuickLoad to compensate for different water grain capacity and seating depth that come with the new chamber) of what the right powder charge would be for the brass and bullet. That group came out to be about 3/8". This is about how it shot when it was new. I thought it was pretty good for a box stock factory rifle when it was new, I'm going to see if optimizing the load for the new chamber will shrink it a little.

I'll go thorugh the process of making up a progressive test and take it back to the range to see if I can find the optimum powder charge for this new chamber. If it will group at a quarter inch, or a tiny bit larger, I'll be very pleased.

At this point I can say it is definitely back to being usable as a medium range (to 300 yards) ground hog rifle, which is what I bought it for in the first place.

As a local club match rifle it won't be competitive because it can no longer be entered in factory class, and I'll have to shoot against all the high dollar custom rifles. I can live with that ... for this year anyway.

Fitch
 
Back
Top