I Need Some Advice

A

AnalogFreak

Guest
Hello everybody, this is my first post here, so I apologize if this is not in the correct forum.

Anyway, I was at a gun show recently, and came across a very interesting pair of rifles. One of them was a more-or-less standard Mauser 98 sporterized job. It had an older redfield scope mounted.

The other was a vintage-looking bench rest rifle. It too was based off of a Mauser 98 action (You could easily read the Gew. 98 on the side of the receivers of both guns). The stock was a walnut rollover job with a very wide (3 1/2"?) forearm. The barrel was a 1.25" rolling pin (Straight sided with no steps). The barrel and receiver had scope mounts. I don't know what they are called (I want to say Davidson, but I'm probably wrong), but they are shaped like trapezoids, wider at the top than at the bottom. There is no scope. Both firearms looked to be in excellent condition.

The odd thing is that both had stamped or engraved markings on the barrel stating that they were .234" caliber. It took a lot of digging to find some information, but I believe that they are chambered for .234 Rock Chucker (Or .234 RCBS). I've never heard of the cartridge before, but it seems like one heck of a rare wildcat. As near as I can tell it is based on a .300 Savage. The seller had a couple of boxes of ammunition that went with the guns. There did not appear to be any other markings on them anywhere, although I could not pull the actions from the stocks.

The asking prices were 400 for the benchrest and 300 for the sporter.

That is about the extent of my knowledge, so here is where somebody can hopefully fill me in:

-Has anyone ever even heard of this cartridge?
-If so, I would be interested to know the dimensions of the cartridge.
-I imagine this cartridge would be fairly close to .243 in terms of performance, but I really don't know.
-Would it be possible to somehow load and shoot these cartridges today?
-Any clues as to who made these or when?
-Assuming that this caliber is completely obsolete, do you think either of the guns would be worth re-barreling to say, 220 swift?
-Finally, what are your views on the pricing? Ripoff, bargain, or fair money?

I'm sorry for the absolute deluge of questions, but this would be my first real target rifle (I own a Savage Model 19, but that is iffy much beyond 75 yards or so) and I don't want to blow my money on an idiotic purchase. I'd ideally like to use the benchrest for 100 and 200 yard targets, and the sporter for plinking / small game.

Thank you in advance.
 
234

Is actually a OLD (late 20s-early 30s)wildcat. I believe it's intent was to make a minimum cal deer cartridge in some states that had a .230 cal limit. Some states set a minimum cal of .230 for deer/big game. Minnesota was one such state up till last year. Now it's ANY 22 CENTERFIRE or larger(anyone care to go hunting with their pot metal 25 auto pisto:rolleyes:l is now legal). The .234 would have been a MINIMUM legal cal (although not factory loaded) for big game in our state anyway until the rule change last year. It also could have been made to UPSTAGE the 22 Savage (5.6x52R) Hi-power which was a .228 cal. Cases would need to be formed (not too tough) but the bullets would be the HARDEST to come by (not sure who/anyone makes the 23cal bullets anymore).
 
Last edited:
I need some advice

Are you sure that 234? Not 243?
I have heard of a 243 rockchucker.
 
That was my first thought as well, that somebody just got the 3 and the 4 backwards. But the .234" was stamped on the barrels of both guns, the ammunition the seller showed me looked nothing like any .243 I've ever seen, and the seller himself told me that it was not a .243. So I'm fairly certain that it was .234.
 
I need some advice

Looks like a find if your a collector"
I like the modern stuff, although over the years i have had some of that stuff. It was fun to play with. One came to mind a 220 wilson arrow on a 98 with a phiffer barrel. It blew up bullets at 75yds :D
 
Thank you for the free advice!

Seeing as I have already registered with this handle, I'm stuck with it unless I register a new account. That would probably be a bigger hassle for everybody than it would be worth. Hopefully, nobody will misjudge me because of it. I'm an electrical engineer by trade and my handle relates to my profession.

At any rate, I'm quickly getting the impression that the .234" bullets for either of these rifles would be nearly impossible to obtain. And that this caliber is virtually unknown. I could always have a new barrel made up in about any chambering I wanted, but that isn't cheap.

I suppose I should mention that I am mostly interested in these rifles for the historical and novelty value first, and if they happen to shoot as well as I suspect they might, then that would be a great bonus.

My standards for accuracy are probably horrid compared to what most people on this forum would consider acceptable. To be frank, I mostly collect old .22s and some military surplus rifles. If either rifle will put ten shots inside of a half inch at 100 yards I would be delighted.

I'm not a benchrest shooter by any stretch of the imagination. I don't have the money for that, and I'm headed back to graduate school soon. That means any money or time that I do have will be consumed by study. Perhaps after I'm finished with my education I can get started with real competitive target shooting, but that isn't my goal at this point.

As for the comments that this rifle would be inherently inaccurate, I am rather confused. Is the problem that the Mauser 98 actions are no longer up to snuff for current competition? Or is it that the bullets would be impossible to find and not up to benchrest standards? Perhaps you imagine that the rifling is shot out. Or is it something that escapes me entirely?

To summarize my current understanding: Bullets would be hard to find, it would not be up to current match standards, and it would probably be more of a curiosity than anything else. Am I correct?
 
Discounting...

Discounting the probability of obtaining bullets for this caliber, the Mauser 98 action is no longer suitable for modern benchrest competition standards. Although appearing in early benchrest rifles due to a lack of better actions plus its moderate cost, it soon lost popularity when the sleeved Remington and custom actions came on the scene that were much stiffer and more adaptable.

Modern benchrest rifles with their custom actions, superlative custom barrels, synthetic stocks, and excellent custom bullets and powders will produce groups when driven correctly by the shooter, in the thousands of an inch larger than the original bullet diameter for a five shot string. This is far beyond the Mauser action's capability.

Time marches on....virg.
 
Back
Top