You have got to be kidding me...
Let's see... where do I begin...
We all know exactly what range and who is being questioned here so, let's not beat around the bush any longer. Scotty and I (Karla Teer, for those of you that don't know who "thescorer" is) each have a child. There was a situation to where the youngest child that was planning on shooting the entire match, had to leave early to go back to her mother's house. The older child was also planning on shooting all of the targets but ended up having to leave just after the third target was shot. AT NO TIME WAS THIS PLANNED AND IT WAS NOT DONE FOR POINTS. We have always been about the kids. The children that are starting to shoot and are interested in shooting are the future of this sport. When we have a child of our own or a friend's child that wants to shoot, we do NOT deny them. They are welcome to come shoot at any match. Now, when a 6 target tournament starts at 6:00pm, it ends up running late into the night. Especially when there is more than one relay. Most of the time, the kids get TIRED. When that happens, they're done shooting. They shot a couple of targets, had fun, hopefully learned a little bit, and then they go home and go to bed still liking the sport. If we start MAKING a child sit there and shoot until they can't see straight from being so tired, they aren't going to be having fun anymore and then we have just killed our future. There is also the parent factor. If a parent allows there child to come and shoot, they may not want them to be there until midnight or later. They have a curfew. Also, just because another club has denied letting a junior shoot at their range, we will NOT deny a junior shooter. We sit them at a bench, give them a nice rest, rifle, and ammo to use, and teach them. Why is that SO WRONG?
Now, for the points factor...
The kids don't care about the points, obviously. However, I'm sure there are some adults out there that DO care about the points. We have just been informed that there is a "new rule" that is going into effect immediately. Whenever a junior shoots less than the scheduled amount of targets, we are now to pull their scores from the sheets and not turn them in to ARA. Fine. However, I do see there being a small problem with that. As I said before, the kids don't care about the points. What they DO care about is seeing their name in a nationally recognized magazine showing which range they shot at and what they scored on their targets. If we are not turning in their scores and they never complete a full match (for WHATEVER reason) that's going to be pretty disappointing for them. Why can't we go ahead, turn in the kids scores to be posted in the magazine, but not allow them any points? However, if a junior shooter DOES complete all of the scheduled targets in a match, then they should be allowed the points as usual. This will make the younger kids happy to see their name in the magazine, the older kids can still compete with the adults, and no one will be "using" kids to rack up the points in a match.
Just a thought.
Regards,
Karla Teer - Match Director for the Bullet Trap in Rayne, Louisiana