RESOLVED: Defective chamber...
RESOLVED: this issue has been resolved, please see the end of the post for the story.
My brother recently bought a new Savage model 12 in 300 WSM. When we fired it, the cases showed a serious chamber flaw on the shoulder.
[URL=http://s186.photobucket.com/user/feffer777/media/first_fire.png.html][/URL]
The case on the right is new and unfired.
I was surprised this got past QC but I said, "just send it back to Savage and they'll take care of it." I was curious as to how this could happen so I posted about it here.
He called them, explained the issue and sent the rifle and 3 fired cases back to them. After a few weeks, they returned the rifle with a few nickle plated "proof" cases they fired in the "polished and fixed" chamber.
[URL=http://s186.photobucket.com/user/feffer777/media/savage_1st_fix.png.html][/URL]
Obviously, the chamber was not corrected, and more alarmingly, they returned these nickle-plated cases somehow thinking it was now OK...maybe because they simply fired successfully in the chamber. Who approved this? I can't believe anyone with technical firearm's knowledge saw these cases as acceptable.
My brother was exasperated, but I told him, talk to someone in a technical position and get them to take responsibility. So he once again returned the gun to Savage. He got it back a few days ago...again with "proof" cases. This time brass. The return letter said the chamber had been "polished," headspace checked and passed, "function-fire" passed, and test cases returned.
[URL=http://s186.photobucket.com/user/feffer777/media/savage_2nd_fix_B.png.html][/URL]
The deeper shoulder marks seemed less, but clearly the shoulder was still not acceptable.
Later when my brother fired a normal load in the "twice fixed" chamber, he got marks almost as deep as before. Had Savage purposely fired a light load or used a pitted case to hide the flaw? I hate to think this, but... Here's what the normal reloads looked like:
[URL=http://s186.photobucket.com/user/feffer777/media/dale_after_2nd_fix_B.jpg.html][/URL]
I posted about this once before, but avoided sending pictures, because I respect some of Savage's innovations, but this is over the top and they deserve to be embarrassed. Though frustrated, my brother has been very polite in his conversations with Savage. I hope when this is all over, I can report that they did the right thing.
As I see it there are two problems:
1. find the right person at Savage who will understand the problem and realize that it is more than a "cosmetic issue."
2. Getting the right resolution.
Unless, someone here has a name or a specific department to call, I guess the first problem is ours...perhaps Savage has a "custom" department with a real gunsmith.
I would appreciate some input on the second problem...getting the proper resolution.
Basically, my brother is looking to "get the gun right" w/o further hassles...and maybe an apology might be nice. What do folks here think will be required to "get the gun right?"
IE, further, more agressive "polishing," or give up on this barrel and replace it, or just replace the whole gun? Or something else. Thx!
thx,
feffer
Note: my first post was edited to put in full size pix, thx Lee for the howto, and to simplify the last paragraph...the response I'm asking from members here.
RESOLVED: this issue has been resolved, please see the end of the post for the story.
My brother recently bought a new Savage model 12 in 300 WSM. When we fired it, the cases showed a serious chamber flaw on the shoulder.
[URL=http://s186.photobucket.com/user/feffer777/media/first_fire.png.html][/URL]
The case on the right is new and unfired.
I was surprised this got past QC but I said, "just send it back to Savage and they'll take care of it." I was curious as to how this could happen so I posted about it here.
He called them, explained the issue and sent the rifle and 3 fired cases back to them. After a few weeks, they returned the rifle with a few nickle plated "proof" cases they fired in the "polished and fixed" chamber.
[URL=http://s186.photobucket.com/user/feffer777/media/savage_1st_fix.png.html][/URL]
Obviously, the chamber was not corrected, and more alarmingly, they returned these nickle-plated cases somehow thinking it was now OK...maybe because they simply fired successfully in the chamber. Who approved this? I can't believe anyone with technical firearm's knowledge saw these cases as acceptable.
My brother was exasperated, but I told him, talk to someone in a technical position and get them to take responsibility. So he once again returned the gun to Savage. He got it back a few days ago...again with "proof" cases. This time brass. The return letter said the chamber had been "polished," headspace checked and passed, "function-fire" passed, and test cases returned.
[URL=http://s186.photobucket.com/user/feffer777/media/savage_2nd_fix_B.png.html][/URL]
The deeper shoulder marks seemed less, but clearly the shoulder was still not acceptable.
Later when my brother fired a normal load in the "twice fixed" chamber, he got marks almost as deep as before. Had Savage purposely fired a light load or used a pitted case to hide the flaw? I hate to think this, but... Here's what the normal reloads looked like:
[URL=http://s186.photobucket.com/user/feffer777/media/dale_after_2nd_fix_B.jpg.html][/URL]
I posted about this once before, but avoided sending pictures, because I respect some of Savage's innovations, but this is over the top and they deserve to be embarrassed. Though frustrated, my brother has been very polite in his conversations with Savage. I hope when this is all over, I can report that they did the right thing.
As I see it there are two problems:
1. find the right person at Savage who will understand the problem and realize that it is more than a "cosmetic issue."
2. Getting the right resolution.
Unless, someone here has a name or a specific department to call, I guess the first problem is ours...perhaps Savage has a "custom" department with a real gunsmith.
I would appreciate some input on the second problem...getting the proper resolution.
Basically, my brother is looking to "get the gun right" w/o further hassles...and maybe an apology might be nice. What do folks here think will be required to "get the gun right?"
IE, further, more agressive "polishing," or give up on this barrel and replace it, or just replace the whole gun? Or something else. Thx!
thx,
feffer
Note: my first post was edited to put in full size pix, thx Lee for the howto, and to simplify the last paragraph...the response I'm asking from members here.
Attachments
Last edited: