I went to the range this morning to work a load for the up and coming East west shoot in St Louis. I got my hands on a couple different BT bullets for the ppc and they shot really well today. What i noticed though was my charge weights with 08 n133 were down from were i normally shoot the FB bullets. With a FB bullet i run around 28.8-29.2gr. with these Bib and Hottenstein bullets i was down to 28.4. Like i said they shot great so no complaints there. What i kinda wonder is since the temps today were in the 80's and humid, is that the reason for the reduced charges? Basically what i would like to know is if the hotter more humid it is, do you general reduce charge weights? That seems to be the case today for me, although the last time i shot this barrel i shot FB bullets and not BT bullets. Or is the reduced charge weight a direct result of a BT vs a FB bullet. Do you general shoot BT bullets with a lower powder charge? I hope all that makes since. LOL!!! I just love this stuff, and i like learning as much as i can about it.
The second thing i would like to discuss is my new Leupold 45x. I set this scope in a set of Bat 20moa 30mm rings. Of course i had to dial the difference of the 20moa to get on paper. What i noticed was that because i had to dial so much to compensate for the 20 moa the image wasnt as clear as it was when the scope is dialed directly in the middle of the MOA range. Is there a tube or something inside there that distorted when i dial that much. I was almost to the very end of the dials to get on paper @ 100 yards with these rings. Is that normal. The scope is really clear when it sits in a standard Kelby/Davidson 0 moa set up. but with these 20moa rings it just wasnt as clear!!
Finally i would like to talk about the eye relief on the 45X. I kept getting whacked with the dam scope today. I know that sounds funny, but i am not sure what i can do about it. I like to shoot free recoil and i didnt think my shoulder was all that far behind the butt. No matter what i tried i got hit. This kinda stinks!! Has anyone else experienced this with a Leupold 45X. I reckon the eye relief is just shorter than a 36X??
These are just a coupe of my experiences today fellas and i would like to learn a little something, plus I dont have anything else to do this afternoon!! LOL!! Have a great Sunday men!! Lee
The second thing i would like to discuss is my new Leupold 45x. I set this scope in a set of Bat 20moa 30mm rings. Of course i had to dial the difference of the 20moa to get on paper. What i noticed was that because i had to dial so much to compensate for the 20 moa the image wasnt as clear as it was when the scope is dialed directly in the middle of the MOA range. Is there a tube or something inside there that distorted when i dial that much. I was almost to the very end of the dials to get on paper @ 100 yards with these rings. Is that normal. The scope is really clear when it sits in a standard Kelby/Davidson 0 moa set up. but with these 20moa rings it just wasnt as clear!!
Finally i would like to talk about the eye relief on the 45X. I kept getting whacked with the dam scope today. I know that sounds funny, but i am not sure what i can do about it. I like to shoot free recoil and i didnt think my shoulder was all that far behind the butt. No matter what i tried i got hit. This kinda stinks!! Has anyone else experienced this with a Leupold 45X. I reckon the eye relief is just shorter than a 36X??
These are just a coupe of my experiences today fellas and i would like to learn a little something, plus I dont have anything else to do this afternoon!! LOL!! Have a great Sunday men!! Lee
Last edited: