Another thing you can do to.............
avoid the "ring" around the bullet's ogive. This 'ring' is usually put there by two things. One, is not having enough of an angle on your chamfering tool. I always used the Lyman VLD tool w/the wooden handle, because I liked that handle, it was comfortable; but, I'm going to try one that indexes off the flashole next.
Even using a flatbased bullet, the shallower angle of the VLD chamfering tool will give you less effort to begin seating that, or any bullet.
Two, all the diemakers that produce a die that's spring-loaded for any reason, will put a spring in there that's overly heavy. I went to a local spring maker in my area, armed w/a spring from a Redding die, showed it to them and told them I wanted something roughly the same size in all simensions, but half, or less, the weight.
They let me look around in their "Odds and Ends" boxes and pick out what I wanted.
The last time I went there, they charged me something like $14.00 for 44-45 springs, all the same size.
Why so many springs?? Well, I've got friends that get me to get them dies, they want me to get them the 'right' dies and set them up so that all they have to do is start loading, and any 'emergency' can be addressed by a tool, or die, or stuck case remover they already have.
Most own businesses and they don't have the time to be searching out the things they'll need.
I came to this conclusion about the chamfering tool and the springs as a result of shooting a .17 Remington, and noticing that ring on the ogive of FB bullets.
The chamfering tool didn't eliminate the ring completely, but that, in concert w/the new springs did.
And guess what?? With all the same components, the same loads, I swear the groups shrank, that rifle became one of those 'right' rifles, more dependable, less fliers.
HTH