H
hulk
Guest
Given that some people never learn, here we go again.
From that paragon of factual information and fair play, "the place of record" for rimfire accuracy.
My second favorite Kool-Aid commando has decided to take some shots at a gentleman from this forum, now known as "the other forum".
He seems to believe that it is ironic the this gentleman takes exception to several "theories" being preached by a gunsmith of some repute, while this same gunsmith is building rifles with world record scores of late, one of the few bits of factual information found there. For the sake of complete disclosure, this same gunsmith put together rifles that finished in less lofty placings, highlighting the fact that the shooter might actually have a part in those scores. Imagine, the best rifle, great ammo and middle of the pack.
In the interest of equal time, ironic is truly when someone does nothing but espouses posts from other web sites regarding an expensive and comprehensive study on barrel indexing that supports their position and months later, lacks the fortitude to admit that no "proof" is coming. All of this at the same time that our world record gunsmith continues to claim that nothing happens when a barrel is indexed.
Now this gunsmith may be one of the best of this generation but to say barrels do not "shoot different" in different positions borders on denial. Even barrels with near perfect bores show different POI through different positions given a constant POA. While no one may be able to explain what barrel indexing does or whether it has any impact on accuracy, there is no doubt that barrels do "shoot different".
Ironic isn't it.
From that paragon of factual information and fair play, "the place of record" for rimfire accuracy.
My second favorite Kool-Aid commando has decided to take some shots at a gentleman from this forum, now known as "the other forum".
He seems to believe that it is ironic the this gentleman takes exception to several "theories" being preached by a gunsmith of some repute, while this same gunsmith is building rifles with world record scores of late, one of the few bits of factual information found there. For the sake of complete disclosure, this same gunsmith put together rifles that finished in less lofty placings, highlighting the fact that the shooter might actually have a part in those scores. Imagine, the best rifle, great ammo and middle of the pack.
In the interest of equal time, ironic is truly when someone does nothing but espouses posts from other web sites regarding an expensive and comprehensive study on barrel indexing that supports their position and months later, lacks the fortitude to admit that no "proof" is coming. All of this at the same time that our world record gunsmith continues to claim that nothing happens when a barrel is indexed.
Now this gunsmith may be one of the best of this generation but to say barrels do not "shoot different" in different positions borders on denial. Even barrels with near perfect bores show different POI through different positions given a constant POA. While no one may be able to explain what barrel indexing does or whether it has any impact on accuracy, there is no doubt that barrels do "shoot different".
Ironic isn't it.