R
rhaney2
Guest
The Howa barrels are less than what i desire,they copper foul pretty bad and some shoot good but go with something else,Mossberg,Savage or a Stevens.
I've got several rifles built on trued Remington actions that I mostly reserve for the range.
There's so many aftermarket parts and my gunsmith has the tools to true them.
But I've bought three Howa barreled actions for hunting rifles and they're great value for money.
I don't know if Howa were manufacturing rifles in WWII, but Roy Weatherby found that the Arisaka Type 38 was the toughest of the surplus rifles to blow up.
There's no doubting the Howa 1500 is a sound design and a quality Japanese product.
Ben
I have looked at the Howa's a couple of times, especially when they were on close-out for around $350, but I don't like the shape of the bolt handle, which offends my sense of aesthetics. But the real reason that I haven't bought one is that I will not buy a rifle manufactured in a country that will not allow its citizens to own any sort of a firearm. Call it petty, or a hang-up on my part but it is just my way of protesting. If it were made in a country that allowed its citizens greater the freedom to own firearms (even with restrictions or some sort) I would buy one and overlook the ugly bolt handle.
But thats just me!
drover
You do know the reason behind them not being allowed to own firearms is because the good old USA won WWII and made it so.
Kinda - Sorta true. The surrender treaty set limits on the military, to the best of my knowledge it never addressed individual firearm ownership. But before we get into a mulit-page spitting contest on this and hi-jack the thread let me retract my original statement and rephrase it.
I don't like Howa rifles because the action is heavy, the bolt handle is ugly IMO, there is a definite lack of aftermarket accessories, and some smiths will not work on them because of the metric threads. There how is that - it should either settle any controversy or start one.
drover