Anybody remember a test posted on here many years ago on how far a firing pin would shove a case on a bullet. I sure remember something like that and can't find it.
It would seem that the maximum distance would be equal to the amount of protrusion of the firing pin from the bolt face.
And only with a jammed bullet. I remember that much and dead primers.
5. what are you trying to accomplish
Did I forget anything?
Centerfire
Anybody remember a test posted on here many years ago on how far a firing pin would shove a case on a bullet. I sure remember something like that and can't find it.
Firing pin energy is used.
Primers are designed to NOT ignite at a stated energy, and 'must fire' at another (larger) energy.
A dropped weight is used to create the energy.
Only two people I know of have posted about testing for firing pin effects by killing primers...... one is me, the other is singing in The Almighty Choir.
It's probably long gone as this board has been destroyed twice since 1993, all posts lost
He's not asking about igniting primers. He is asking about a firing pin having enough forward force to cause a seated bullet to become seated even deeper. If you have a 24# spring and it takes more than 24# of force to make the bullet move, the spring will just stay compressed. Obviously you would not be using live primers for this.
And the primer is going to swamp the firing pin protrusion in moving the bullet down the bore.
It is a truly meaninglessness question.
And "Firing pin force" is not the same as firing pin protrusion.
The whole thing is poorly formed.
And the primer is going to swamp the firing pin protrusion in moving the bullet down the bore.
It is a truly meaninglessness question.
I asked if anyone remembered the referenced test. No more no less. Al gave me an answer. Probably lost in the archives..
It would seem that the maximum distance would be equal to the amount of protrusion of the firing pin from the bolt face.
And the primer is going to swamp the firing pin protrusion in moving the bullet down the bore.
It is a truly meaninglessness question.
I asked if anyone remembered the referenced test. No more no less. Al gave me an answer. Probably lost in the archives..
Well, obviously there was a reason for asking other than rhetorical.
On a bottlenecked case that has the proper headspace for the chamber it is in, the case can not
shove on the bullet....
.
I withdraw my observation that there's no such thing as a dumb question.
No question is totally useless; it can always be used as a horrible example.