Firing pin force

sdean

Member
Anybody remember a test posted on here many years ago on how far a firing pin would shove a case on a bullet. I sure remember something like that and can't find it.
 
Anybody remember a test posted on here many years ago on how far a firing pin would shove a case on a bullet. I sure remember something like that and can't find it.

It would seem that the maximum distance would be equal to the amount of protrusion of the firing pin from the bolt face.
 
And only with a jammed bullet. I remember that much and dead primers.

You'd want a .308 case in a .30-06 chamber with a long flat nose jammed bullet. You might need to turn one on a lathe. Instead of a primer use a piece of steel of the same size. Remove the extractor from the bolt so that when you open it, it doesn't try to extract the round. Chamber the round and open the bolt. GENTLY tap it out with a rod and measure the length. Lay the figure down on a pad. Next rechamber it and pull the trigger. GENTLY tap it out again and measure it. Set the figure down on a pad. Subtract the figure and see if there is a difference. I'd put a smidgen of sizing wax in the case neck too if twas me.

May the force be with you!
 
Last edited:
Questions

1. what is the action being used
2. what is the firing spring pounds of weight
3. what caliber
4. is the case sized to only allow 0.0005" of case movement (growth)
5. what are you trying to accomplish
6. what brand of primer/size being used
7. At what depth is the primer being seated into the primer pocket.

Did I forget anything?
Centerfire
 
Anybody remember a test posted on here many years ago on how far a firing pin would shove a case on a bullet. I sure remember something like that and can't find it.

Firing pin energy is used.

Primers are designed to NOT ignite at a stated energy, and 'must fire' at another (larger) energy.
A dropped weight is used to create the energy.
 
Firing pin energy is used.

Primers are designed to NOT ignite at a stated energy, and 'must fire' at another (larger) energy.
A dropped weight is used to create the energy.

He's not asking about igniting primers. He is asking about a firing pin having enough forward force to cause a seated bullet to become seated even deeper. If you have a 24# spring and it takes more than 24# of force to make the bullet move, the spring will just stay compressed. Obviously you would not be using live primers for this.
 
Only two people I know of have posted about testing for firing pin effects by killing primers...... one is me, the other is singing in The Almighty Choir.

It's probably long gone as this board has been destroyed twice since 1993, all posts lost
 
Only two people I know of have posted about testing for firing pin effects by killing primers...... one is me, the other is singing in The Almighty Choir.

It's probably long gone as this board has been destroyed twice since 1993, all posts lost


Thanks Al.
 
He's not asking about igniting primers. He is asking about a firing pin having enough forward force to cause a seated bullet to become seated even deeper. If you have a 24# spring and it takes more than 24# of force to make the bullet move, the spring will just stay compressed. Obviously you would not be using live primers for this.

And the primer is going to swamp the firing pin protrusion in moving the bullet down the bore.

It is a truly meaninglessness question.

And "Firing pin force" is not the same as firing pin protrusion.
The whole thing is poorly formed.
 
And the primer is going to swamp the firing pin protrusion in moving the bullet down the bore.

It is a truly meaninglessness question.

And "Firing pin force" is not the same as firing pin protrusion.
The whole thing is poorly formed.

True because we don't really know what he is asking and whether we are talking about live primers or whatever. It's commonly known that firing a round with no powder in it usually has sufficient force to drive a bullet into the lands and it may stay there when you open the bolt. Of course that's primer force and not firing pin force.

However he did ask about firing pin force so that's what I addressed. That will be about equal to the weight in pounds of the spring in the bolt which is 24# in factory Rem 700s. If you replace the primer with a SOLID pellet of equal size and thickness and cock the bolt and fire, the firing pin should exert a force on the case to move it forward [assuming it's allowed to do so] at which point the bullet may seat tighter into the lands or seat deeper into the case neck. Once fired, the firing pins protrudes only so far from the bolt face and after which time it no longer exerts any force. Thus, the maximum amount that a bullet could be seated deeper would be equal to or [likely less] than the amount of protrusion of the firing pin from the bolt face.


I do note that the OP has not come back to clarify just what it was that he wanted to know.
I tried to answer the question from the confusing point that it was written.
 
Last edited:
And the primer is going to swamp the firing pin protrusion in moving the bullet down the bore.

It is a truly meaninglessness question.


I asked if anyone remembered the referenced test. No more no less. Al gave me an answer. Probably lost in the archives..
 
On a bottlenecked case that has the proper headspace for the chamber it is in, the case can not
shove on the bullet....



.

True; which is why I later suggested a test using a case with the shoulder set back or save the trouble and just use a .308 case in a .30-06 chamber.

The whole premise is more trouble than it's worth. As long as the primer is soft enough to accept an indentation, the bullet won't seat deeper anyway.

Of course if it COULD do it then that would be the correct maximum distance.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top